Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Essentializing differences between women and men.

Deborah A Prentice1, Dale T Miller

  • 1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Green Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-1010, USA. predebb@princeton.edu

Psychological Science
|February 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Being "good" or "good enough": Prosocial risk and the structure of moral self-regard.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2019
Same author

The effect of a savings intervention on women's intimate partner violence victimization: heterogeneous findings from a randomized controlled trial in Colombia.

BMC women's health·2019
Same author

Social norm perception in groups with outliers.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2017
Same author

The integration of social influence and reward: Computational approaches and neural evidence.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2017
Same author

Behavioral Processes in Long-Lag Intervention Studies.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2017
Same author

Changing Norms to Change Behavior.

Annual review of psychology·2015
Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Social category beliefs influence how people make inferences. Discovering differences between oneself and others, particularly across gender, strengthens social reasoning about novel attributes.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Gender Studies

Background:

  • People often essentialize social categories, believing members share inherent, nonobvious properties.
  • This essentialist view shapes how individuals perceive and make inferences about social groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of essentialist social category representation on social inference.
  • To examine how perceived similarity or difference influences inductive reasoning about novel attributes.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were exposed to information about their similarity or difference to a member of the other gender on a novel attribute.
  • A control group learned only their own standing on the attribute.
  • Inductive inferences about the attribute were measured across conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Stronger inductive inferences were made when participants learned the attribute distinguished them from a member of the other gender.
  • Perceived difference, rather than similarity, enhanced social attribute inference.
  • Essentialist beliefs about gender categories appear to moderate inference processes.

Conclusions:

  • The way social categories are represented, particularly through essentialism, significantly affects social inference.
  • Highlighting intergroup differences can enhance inductive reasoning about social attributes.
  • Findings have implications for understanding everyday social cognition and intergroup relations.