Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response preparation modulates interference from irrelevant spatial information.

Peter Wühr1

  • 1Friedrich-Alexander Universität, Institut für Psychologie I, Kochstrasse 4, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. peter.wuehr@psy.phil.uni-erlangen.de

Acta Psychologica
|February 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response Requirements Shape the Spatial Coding of Location-Specific Adjustments to Conflict Frequency.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Associations Between Physical Stimulus Size and Vertical Response Locations.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

Response Preparation and the Simon Effect: Experimental and Model-Based Analyses.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

The impact of visuomotor skills on two pen-and-paper tests of sustained attention (d2-R, FAIR).

Psychological research·2025
Same author

The functional role of the task-irrelevant stimulus feature in the congruency sequence effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

Where does the processing of size meet the processing of space?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same journal

Understanding Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in university students: Exploring the roles of neurotic perfectionism, parental perception, and stressful life events.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Tailoring instruction to personality: The mediating role of cognitive tendencies in the effect of extraversion on higher vocational college students' self-regulated learning.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Physical activity and loneliness in rural left-behind children: The mediating roles of social anxiety and self-concept.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Is the juice worth the squeeze? Implications of employee perfectionism and excellencism for in-role and extra-role performance.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Teachers' readiness for sustainable inclusive practices for supporting deaf learners: A cross-sectional study of psychological and contextual dimensions in northern Saudi Arabia.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Health-related quality of life and associated factors among autistic adolescents and young adults, and their peers with mental disorders, and without autism or mental disorders in Chile.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals how response cues impact the Simon effect. Reliable cues decrease the Simon effect, while unreliable cues increase it, supporting the event-coding hypothesis.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Previous research on the Simon effect consistently used unreliable response cues.
  • These studies found that valid response cues amplify the Simon effect compared to neutral cues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differing effects of reliable versus unreliable response cues on the Simon effect.
  • To test predictions from the response-speed and event-coding hypotheses.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted, comparing unreliable and reliable response cues.
  • Experiment 1 utilized unreliable cues, replicating prior findings.
  • Experiment 2 employed reliable cues to observe contrasting effects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Experiment 1 (unreliable cues): Valid cues enhanced the Simon effect; invalid cues reduced it.
  • Experiment 2 (reliable cues): Valid cues diminished the Simon effect, while invalid cues had the opposite effect.
  • Results demonstrated qualitatively different response preparation strategies for reliable and unreliable cues.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the event-coding hypothesis over the response-speed hypothesis.
  • Response preparation differs significantly based on the reliability of cues.
  • This has implications for understanding cognitive control and stimulus-response compatibility.