Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using the past to predict the future.

Michael R Dougherty1, Petra Scheck, Thomas O Nelson

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA. mdougherty@psyc.umd.edu

Memory & Cognition
|February 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Rethinking the Role of Teams and Training in Geopolitical Forecasting: The Effect of Uncontrolled Method Variance on Statistical Conclusions.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

A memory-theoretic account of citation propagation.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences.

Royal Society open science·2022
Same author

Further evolution of natural categorization systems: an approach to evolving color concepts.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2019
Same author

Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2019
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Metacognitive judgments like retrospective confidence judgments (RCJs) and judgments of learning (JOLs) assess memory differently. Making JOLs, unlike RCJs, enhances subsequent recall performance by improving learning.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Metacognition
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Metacognition involves monitoring and controlling one's own cognitive processes.
  • Judgments of learning (JOLs) and retrospective confidence judgments (RCJs) are key metacognitive measures.
  • Understanding how these judgments relate to memory accuracy and learning is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differential memory assessment between RCJs and JOLs.
  • To compare the predictive accuracy of JOLs and RCJs for future recall.
  • To determine if making JOLs or RCJs enhances subsequent memory recall.

Main Methods:

  • Participants made retrospective confidence judgments (RCJs) and judgments of learning (JOLs) on memory items.
  • The accuracy of these judgments in predicting future recall was assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subsequent recall performance was compared across conditions: JOLs, RCJs, and no judgment.

    • Main Results:

    • Both RCJs and JOLs rely on memory retrievability, but are formed using distinct mnemonic processes.
    • Predictive accuracy varied: RCJs were more accurate for some items, JOLs for others.
    • Recall was significantly improved following the JOL condition, but not the RCJ condition.

    Conclusions:

    • JOLs and RCJs reflect different aspects of memory monitoring.
    • The JOL task itself acts as a learning event, enhancing memory consolidation.
    • Metacognitive judgments play a dual role in assessing and improving memory.