Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Single Cell Multiplex Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction After Patch-clamp
Published on: June 20, 2018
Differences between pair-wise and multi-sequence alignment methods affect vertebrate genome comparisons
Elliott H Margulies1, Christina W Chen, Eric D Green
1Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. elliott@nhgri.nih.gov
Abstract:
Producing complete and accurate alignments of multiple genomic sequences is complex and prone to errors, especially with sequences generated from highly diverged species. In this article, we show that multi-sequence (as opposed to pair-wise) alignment methods are substantially better at aligning (or 'capturing') all of the available orthologous sequence from phylogenetically diverse vertebrates (i.e. those separated by relatively long branch lengths). Maximum gains are obtained only when sequences from many species are aligned. Such multi-sequence alignments contain significant amounts of exonic and highly conserved non-exonic sequences that are not captured in pair-wise alignments, thus illustrating the importance of the alignment method used for performing comparative genome analyses.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Multi-species Conserved Sequences
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved DNA...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Synteny and Evolution
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral chromosome underwent...
Genome Annotation and Assembly

