Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Cardiac Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis Using Conductance Catheters in Mice
Published on: September 17, 2015
Do losartan and atenolol have differential effects on BNP and central haemodynamic parameters?
Justine Davies1, Elaine Carr, Margaret Band
1Division of Medicine and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK. j.i.davies@dundee.ac.uk
Insights
Losartan reduced brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) more than atenolol, suggesting a potential benefit beyond blood pressure lowering. However, no significant differences in central or peripheral hemodynamics were observed between the two drugs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Pharmacology
- Hypertension Management
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may offer hemodynamic benefits beyond brachial blood pressure reduction.
- Investigating differential effects of losartan (ARB) versus atenolol (beta-blocker) on hemodynamics and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is crucial for understanding treatment benefits.
- The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study provides a context for comparing these antihypertensive agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of losartan and atenolol on central and brachial hemodynamics.
- To assess the differential impact of losartan and atenolol on brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels.
- To determine if hemodynamic differences contribute to the observed benefits of losartan over atenolol.
Main Methods:
- A crossover study involving 17 patients, randomized to receive four months of losartan and atenolol.
- Primary outcome measures included BNP levels and Augmentation Index (AIx) for central hemodynamics.
- Secondary measures included brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV) and time to reflected wave (Tr) to assess vascular stiffness.
Main Results:
- BNP levels were significantly lower with losartan compared to atenolol (p=0.007).
- Augmentation Index (AIx) was lower with losartan (p=0.03), but this did not remain significant after adjusting for heart rate (p=0.09).
- Heart rate was significantly lower with atenolol (p=0.03); no significant differences were found in brachial PWV or Tr between treatments.
Conclusions:
- The observed benefits of losartan compared to atenolol in the LIFE trial may be attributed to its effect on reducing BNP.
- No differential effect on central or peripheral hemodynamics was detected between losartan and atenolol in this study.
- Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms behind the differential effects of ARBs and beta-blockers on cardiovascular outcomes.
Introduction:
It has been suggested that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have a differential effect on brachial and aortic haemodynamics. This is why they seem to have beneficial effects that are beyond brachial blood pressure (BP) lowering. We aimed to investigate if this was the case with losartan when compared to atenolol. We also investigated the differential effect of losartan and atenolol on the prognostic marker, brain type natriuretic peptide (BNP).
Methods:
We studied 17 patients who were similar to those in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. Patients were randomised to receive four months of losartan and atenolol in a crossover fashion. Main outcome measures were BNP and Augmentation index (AIx), which gives an indication of central haemodynamics. Brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV) and time to reflected wave (Tr) were measured as an indication of vascular stiffness.
Results:
BNP was significantly lower on losartan than atenolol (p=0.007). AIx was lower on losartan than atenolol (p=0.03), however, this result was not significant when heart rate was considered as a covariate (p=0.09). Heart rate was significantly lower on atenolol than losartan (p=0.03). There was no difference between treatments for both brachial PWV and Tr (p=0.2 and p=0.99, respectively).
Conclusion:
The benefits seen when losartan was compared to atenolol in the LIFE trial may be due to a reduction in BNP. We failed to detect a differential effect in central compared to peripheral haemodynamics when losartan was compared to atenolol.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of β1 Blockers