Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Letter processing in the visual system: different activation patterns for single letters and strings.

Karin H James1, Thomas W James, Gael Jobard

  • 1Psychology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. khjames@indiana.edu

Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
|March 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Language laterality and cognitive skills: does anatomy matter?

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial ability.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Cognition, but not affect, rests upon a segregated intrinsic network architecture.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Using scene proximity judgments to study food-specific recognition ability.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Attention control contributes to ensemble perception regardless of selection demands.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Object recognition ability predicts episodic location memory, enhanced by meaningfulness.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

How the brain represents a romantic partner: Dissociable roles of the nucleus accumbens and anterior insula.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Predictive processing in time perception: Assessing prediction error minimization in the sub-second range.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Fronto-Parietal EEG asymmetry interactions predict negative attention bias: A secondary data analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: The neural basis of cost-benefit trade-offs in effort investment: a quantitative activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

The influence of effort expenditure on the neurophysiological substrates of reward processing in early adolescence.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Reading experience shapes the brain's visual processing of letters. Distinct brain regions respond to single letters versus letter strings, revealing specialized visual representations.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Lifetime experience with letter recognition is expected to influence the visual system.
  • Surprisingly, limited evidence exists for specific neural responses to letters compared to visual controls.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate neural responses to isolated characters and character strings.
  • To examine the specialization of the visual word form area (VWFA) and adjacent regions for letter processing.

Main Methods:

  • fMRI brain imaging during a sequential matching task.
  • Presentation of isolated characters (Roman letters, digits, Chinese characters) and strings.
  • Analysis using regions of interest and individual pattern analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The VWFA, identified using pseudowords vs. letter strings, showed no specific visual specialization for letters.
  • A left fusiform area posterior to the VWFA was selective for letter strings.
  • A more anterior left fusiform region demonstrated selectivity for single letters.

Conclusions:

  • Reading experience fine-tunes visual representations at different processing levels.
  • A dissociation exists between selectivity for letter strings and single letters.
  • Processing of nonpronounceable letter strings is not equivalent to single-letter perception.