Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Principles: when there should be no difference--how to fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Michael J Lew1

  • 1Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. michaell@unimelb.edu.au

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
|April 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary

In experiments where failing to reject the null hypothesis is a success, researchers must confirm its validity. This approach differs from traditional experiments that aim to discard the null hypothesis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Reckless Guide to P-values : Local Evidence, Global Errors.

Handbook of experimental pharmacology·2020
Same author

Multi-Component Mechanism of H2 Relaxin Binding to RXFP1 through NanoBRET Kinetic Analysis.

iScience·2018
Same author

Cortisol limits selected actions of synthetic glucocorticoids in the airway epithelium.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2017
Same author

Biased signalling from the glucocorticoid receptor: Renewed opportunity for tailoring glucocorticoid activity.

Biochemical pharmacology·2016
Same author

Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) protein and transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) protein coupling is required for sustained inflammatory signaling.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2013
Same author

N-glycosylation determines ionic permeability and desensitization of the TRPV1 capsaicin receptor.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2012

Area of Science:

  • Experimental design
  • Statistical analysis
  • Hypothesis testing

Background:

  • Traditional experiments often define success as rejecting the null hypothesis.
  • A growing number of studies consider failing to reject the null hypothesis as a successful outcome.
  • This distinction is critical in experiments where design flaws can falsely support the null hypothesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of distinguishing between failing to reject and proving the null hypothesis.
  • To emphasize the need for appropriate statistical analysis in specific experimental contexts.
  • To guide researchers in designing and interpreting experiments where the null hypothesis is not rejected.

Main Methods:

  • Review of statistical principles in hypothesis testing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of experimental designs where null hypothesis non-rejection is the objective.
  • Discussion of appropriate analytical methods for validating the null hypothesis.

    • Main Results:

    • Failing to reject the null hypothesis does not equate to proving its validity.
    • Experimental inadequacies can increase the likelihood of failing to reject the null hypothesis.
    • Standard statistical tests may be insufficient for confirming null hypothesis validity.

    Conclusions:

    • Experiments aiming for null hypothesis non-rejection require specific analytical approaches.
    • Researchers must actively seek evidence for the null hypothesis's validity, not just a lack of evidence against it.
    • Careful experimental design and analysis are crucial to avoid misinterpreting results in these specialized experiments.