Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Participant recruitment methods and statistical reasoning performance.

Gary L Brase1, Laurence Fiddick, Clare Harries

  • 1University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MI 65211, USA. braseg@missouri.edu

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|April 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptions of Income Inequality and Women's Intrasexual Competition.

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Improving patient understanding of prenatal screening tests: Using naturally sampled frequencies, pictures, and accounting for individual differences.

PEC innovation·2023
Same author

Sex, and other important things: Tracking ratios of ecologically significant categories.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2022
Same author

Simulating human behavioral changes in livestock production systems during an epidemic: The case of the US beef cattle industry.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Impact of truck contamination and information sharing on foot-and-mouth disease spreading in beef cattle production systems.

PloS one·2020
Same author

"Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations": Correction to Buss et al. (2020).

Journal of personality and social psychology·2020
Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Replication issues in Bayesian reasoning studies stem from participant sampling. Top university students, compensated for participation, yield the best results, highlighting the impact of participant quality and incentives on cognitive performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Bayesian Reasoning

Background:

  • Optimal Bayesian reasoning performance has been difficult to replicate across studies.
  • Previous research has proposed various explanations for these replication challenges.
  • Methodological variations, particularly in participant selection, may underlie these discrepancies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of participant-sampling methodologies on Bayesian reasoning performance.
  • To identify specific factors related to participant source and incentives that influence performance.
  • To explain the variability observed in previous Bayesian reasoning replication attempts.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a series of experiments manipulating participant source (top-tier vs. second-tier universities) and participation incentives (paid vs. unpaid).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared performance of honours-programme undergraduates versus regular undergraduates.
  • Assessed the effect of pictorial representations supplementing problem text on performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Students from top-tier universities who were paid for participation demonstrated the highest Bayesian reasoning performance.
    • Performance significantly decreased with unpaid participants or students from lower-ranked universities.
    • Honours students outperformed regular students; pictorial aids had a slight facilitative effect.

    Conclusions:

    • Participant-sampling methodologies, including university tier and compensation, are critical determinants of Bayesian reasoning performance.
    • Future research should account for these methodological details to ensure accurate replication.
    • Focusing on relative performance levels, rather than absolute scores, is recommended.