Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visuospatial working memory and the processing of spatial descriptions.

Emilie Deyzac1, Robert H Logie, Michel Denis

  • 1Groupe Cognition Humaine, LIMSI-CNRS, Orsay, France.

British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
|April 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The status and interpretation of neuropsychological evidence: Commentary on 'No evidence yet for functional independence of verbal short-term memory and long-term verbal knowledge' by Majerus, Cowan and Oberauer (2026).

Journal of neuropsychology·2026
Same author

When repeated presentation of visual feature bindings does and does not result in learning: Visual short-term and long-term memory are distinct but work in tandem.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Internal structure of the prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire - PRMQ - in a sample of 297,242 participants.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same author

Different measures of working memory decline at different rates across adult ageing and dual task costs plateau in mid-life.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Controversies, strategies, and collaboration in cognitive neuropsychology.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2024
Same author

Towards theoretically understanding how long-term memory semantics can support working memory performance.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024
Same journal

Big size with big heart: The effect of body size cue on perceived forgivingness.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Time poverty increases self-dehumanization through undermining belief in free will.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Temporal dynamics of induced mood and its relationship with modality and individual trait.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Less is more when time is scarce: How time poverty enhances minimalistic consumption through increased need for order.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Time poverty and access-based consumption: Convenience gains and risk blindness.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Contextual cues do not facilitate spontaneous face recognition.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals how working memory components process spatial descriptions. Landmark processing engages visual and spatial working memory, while landmark positions primarily use spatial working memory.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Understanding how humans process and recall spatial information is crucial for navigation and memory research.
  • Working memory, with its distinct components (spatial, visual, verbal), is hypothesized to play a key role in processing environmental descriptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specific working memory resources (spatial, visual, verbal) engaged during the processing of route and survey spatial descriptions.
  • To determine if landmarks and their relative positions are processed using different cognitive mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • A dual-task paradigm was employed, where participants listened to either route or survey descriptions of spatial environments and subsequently drew maps.
  • Interference tasks targeting different working memory components were used to assess resource demands.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Recall performance for landmarks was lower than for associated moves/locations in both description types.
  • Landmark processing in route descriptions engaged both visual and spatial working memory.
  • Move/location processing relied primarily on spatial working memory for both route and survey descriptions.
  • Verbal working memory was involved only in processing landmarks within survey descriptions.

Conclusions:

  • Distinct cognitive processes and working memory resources are utilized for remembering route versus survey spatial descriptions.
  • The processing of landmarks and their relative positions relies on separable working memory systems.