Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

DNA damage repair: anytime, anywhere?

Jeroen Essers1, Wim Vermeulen, Adriaan B Houtsmuller

  • 1Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Current Opinion in Cell Biology
|April 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recruitment and release of XPG during NER is controlled by pre- and post-incision factors and EXO1.

The Journal of cell biology·2026
Same author

Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair protects against genomic instability and cell death induced by the liver toxin methyleugenol.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer·2026
Same author

Neural network reveals platelet age from fluorescence microscopy images.

Platelets·2026
Same author

Automated FRAP microscopy for high-throughput analysis of protein dynamics in chromatin organization and transcription.

FEBS open bio·2025
Same author

Differential roles of DNA double strand break repair pathways in response to X-ray, proton, and alpha-particle irradiation.

International journal of radiation biology·2025
Same journal

Mechanosensing in immune cells: Implications for migration and beyond.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Emerging role of organelles in cell migration.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Nuclear adaptation in cell migration.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Patterns in motion: Choreographing dynamic cell behaviours during tissue repair.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Quo vadis reconstituted cell surfaces? Purpose and future perspectives for minimal systems of the cell plasma membrane.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Nuclear determinants of mRNA and protein isoforms.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
See all related articles

DNA damage response relies on transcription and replication, but repair can happen anywhere. Live cell imaging helps understand genome caretaking mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • DNA damage response (DDR) is crucial for maintaining genomic integrity.
  • DDR shares factors and strategies with transcription and replication.
  • Unlike transcription and replication, DNA repair is needed ubiquitously and promptly upon DNA damage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the spatiotemporal organization of genome caretaking.
  • To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the cellular response to DNA damage.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative live cell imaging techniques.
  • Methods to induce local DNA damage in specific nuclear regions.

Main Results:

  • Live cell imaging provides insights into dynamic DDR processes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Localized DNA damage induction reveals spatiotemporal repair dynamics.
  • Common factors and strategies are utilized across DNA transacting processes.

    • Conclusions:

    • Quantitative imaging is essential for understanding DDR spatiotemporal organization.
    • The cellular response to DNA damage involves complex spatiotemporal regulation.
    • Further research is needed to fully unravel genome caretaking mechanisms.