Evaluating research misconduct policies at major research universities: a pilot study
1University of Illinois at Chicago, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research (m/c 672), 1737 W. Polk Street, Suite 310, Chicago, IL 6062-7227, USA. rebecca@uic.edu
Accountability in Research
|April 26, 2006
Summary
Research misconduct policies at top universities are hard to find and vary in usefulness. Many policies lack crucial details, indicating a need for clearer, more comprehensive guidelines to ensure research integrity.
Area of Science:
- Academic integrity
- Scientific policy analysis
Background:
- Research misconduct poses a significant threat to scientific integrity.
- Accessibility and content of research misconduct policies are crucial for effective implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accessibility and usefulness of research misconduct (RM) policies at top U.S. research universities.
- To identify gaps in policy content and accessibility for potential improvement.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of RM policies from top-25 universities based on NIH and NSF grant awards.
- Quantified policy accessibility by counting clicks from university homepages.
- Coded policy content across 20 topic areas within five domains.
Main Results:
- RM policies required an average of five clicks to access; only nine were accessible within three clicks.
- Significant variation in policy usefulness, with some covering most topics and others leaving many unanswered.
- Three topic areas were universally covered, while five others averaged less than 50% of potential information.
Conclusions:
- Current RM policies at leading research universities exhibit inconsistent accessibility and content usefulness.
- Policies should be revised for clarity and comprehensiveness to serve as effective models for research integrity.
Related Concept Videos
01:56Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
02:16Surveys
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
01:22Bias
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
01:40Archival Research
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
00:52Social Proof
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.