Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The embryo rescue case.

S Matthew Liao1

  • 1Johns Hopkins University, 624 N. Broadway, 3rd Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. sliao@jhsph.edu

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|May 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Embryo Rescue Case, often used to argue against embryo rights, is re-examined. This paper contends that the case does not definitively prove human embryos lack moral status or rights.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AI Ethics 2.0: Why Frontier AI Demands a New Governance Agenda for Healthcare.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

'Why Do You Ask?' Revisiting the Purpose of Eliciting the Public's Moral Judgments About Emerging Technologies.

AJOB empirical bioethics·2025
Same author

Computational ethics.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2022
Same author

The Place of Philosophy in Bioethics Today.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2021
Same author

Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?

BMC medical ethics·2021
Same author

Designing humans: A human rights approach.

Bioethics·2018
Same journal

The mechanics of epistemic justice: a response to Toding et al. and their application of my epistemic approach to dignity.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Flourishing within vulnerability: on human fragility and the conditions for a habitable environment.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Camouflaging in autism as a dual-normative construct: a philosophical critique.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

The last low whispers revisited: a reply to Sulmasy on palliative sedation.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Epistemic justice and the moral status of the dead.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Practical wisdom in medicine: defending a multidimensional, integrated view of an indispensable virtue.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Moral Philosophy
  • Reproductive Ethics

Background:

  • The moral status of human embryos is a contentious issue in bioethics.
  • The Embryo Rescue Case is frequently cited to argue that embryos are not rightholders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the argument that the Embryo Rescue Case demonstrates embryos are not rightholders.
  • To challenge the prevailing interpretation of the Embryo Rescue Case in the debate on embryo moral status.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of the Embryo Rescue Case.
  • Examination of the logical structure and assumptions of the argument.

Main Results:

  • The Embryo Rescue Case does not, on its own, establish that embryos lack the status of rightholders.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The intuitive wrongness of prioritizing embryos over a child does not preclude embryos from possessing certain rights.

    • Conclusions:

    • The moral status of human embryos requires further philosophical investigation beyond the Embryo Rescue Case.
    • The argument from the Embryo Rescue Case against embryo rights is inconclusive.