Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026
07:19
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
Predicted threshold against backward balance loss in gait
Feng Yang1, Frank C Anderson, Yi-Chung Pai
1Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Journal of Biomechanics
|May 26, 2006
Summary
Preventing backward loss of balance during walking requires a higher minimum forward center of mass (COM) velocity than during standing. This finding highlights crucial differences in gait and standing postural stability.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human locomotion
- Gait analysis
Background:
- Maintaining balance during gait is critical for preventing falls.
- Previous research established stability limits for standing balance.
- Postural differences between gait and standing may affect balance requirements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the minimum forward center of mass (COM) velocity needed to avoid backward loss of balance during gait.
- To compare these velocities with those required for symmetric bipedal standing.
- To investigate the influence of initial COM position on balance recovery during walking.
Main Methods:
- A seven-link, nine-degree-of-freedom biomechanical model was developed.
- Dynamic optimization and simulated annealing were used to estimate minimum COM velocities.
- Simulations considered two initial postural conditions: gait (toe-off) and symmetric bipedal standing.
Main Results:
- The stability boundary against backward balance loss in walking showed a similar trend to standing.
- Minimum COM velocity to prevent backward balance loss was generally greater during walking than standing.
- Differences in required COM velocity could exceed 30% when the COM was positioned behind the base of support.
Conclusions:
- Gait requires a higher minimum forward COM velocity to prevent backward balance loss compared to standing.
- Simpler biomechanical models may be insufficient for accurately assessing human stability limits.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for fall prevention strategies and rehabilitation.
