Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive architecture and descent with modification.

Gary F Marcus1

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, NY, USA. gary.marcus@nyu.edu <gary.marcus@nyu.edu>

Cognition
|June 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational limits don't fully explain human cognitive limitations.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2020
Same author

The roles of item repetition and position in infants' abstract rule learning.

Infant behavior & development·2018
Same author

Songbirds work around computational complexity by learning song vocabulary independently of sequence.

Nature communications·2017
Same author

Still searching for principles: a response to Goodman et al. (2015).

Psychological science·2015
Same author

How robust are probabilistic models of higher-level cognition?

Psychological science·2013
Same author

Stepwise acquisition of vocal combinatorial capacity in songbirds and human infants.

Nature·2013
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study contrasts two views of cognitive modularity. Sui generis modularity is challenged by neuroscientific data, while descent-with-modification modularity offers a compatible evolutionary framework.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Evolutionary Psychology

Background:

  • Recent advances in developmental neuroscience challenge traditional views of cognitive modularity.
  • Two main conceptions of modularity exist: sui generis (independent modules) and descent-with-modification (evolutionarily shaped modules).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To contrast sui generis modularity with descent-with-modification modularity.
  • To evaluate the compatibility of each modularity concept with current neuroscientific and developmental data.
  • To explore the implications of these concepts for developmental disorders and linguistics.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of competing modularity hypotheses.
  • Review of empirical data from developmental neuroscience, including co-occurring deficits and neuroimaging studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual integration of evolutionary principles with cognitive architecture.

    • Main Results:

    • Data from neuroimaging and deficit patterns are incompatible with sui generis modularity.
    • The same data are compatible with the descent-with-modification model of modularity.
    • Sui generis modularity fails to account for the interconnectedness and evolutionary history of cognitive systems.

    Conclusions:

    • Descent-with-modification modularity provides a more robust framework for understanding cognitive architecture.
    • This evolutionary perspective has significant implications for research in developmental disorders and linguistics.
    • Rethinking modularity is crucial for advancing developmental neuroscience.