Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning.

Dagmar Zeithamova1, W Todd Maddox

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. zeithamova@mail.utexas.edu

Memory & Cognition
|June 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hippocampal connectivity predicting recognition and categorization abilities.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Successful generalization of conceptual knowledge after training to remember specific events.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Examining memory specificity and generalization contributions to false recall in DRM paradigm.

Research square·2026
Same author

From cognitive abstraction to adaptive behavior: neural bases of concept learning in autistic adolescents.

Molecular autism·2026
Same author

Ventromedial prefrontal cortex supports prototype representations in healthy older adults.

Neurobiology of aging·2026
Same author

From cognitive abstraction to adaptive behavior: neural bases of concept learning in autistic adolescents.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

A dual working memory task disrupts rule-based category learning more than information integration learning. This suggests distinct cognitive systems for hypothesis-testing and implicit category acquisition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Perceptual category learning involves acquiring knowledge about stimulus categories.
  • Working memory plays a crucial role in various cognitive tasks, including learning and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of a working-memory-demanding dual task on different types of perceptual category learning.
  • To explore the underlying cognitive systems involved in category acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in category learning tasks under single-task and dual-task (working memory demanding) conditions.
  • Two experiments examined unidimensional rule-based, information integration, and conjunctive rule-based category structures.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Rule-based category learning was significantly more impaired by the dual task compared to information integration learning.
  • Rule-based learning showed a bimodal score distribution, unlike the normal distribution for information integration.
  • Dual task disruption occurred even when all dimensions were relevant for rule-based learning.

    • Conclusions:

    • Evidence supports at least two distinct category learning systems: a hypothesis-testing system (verbalizable rules, working memory-dependent) and an implicit system (procedural, automatic).
    • Working memory and attention are critical for explicit, rule-based category learning but less so for implicit learning.