Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Care management program evaluation: constituents, conflicts, and moves toward standardization.

D Adam Long1, Theodore L Perry, Kenneth R Pelletier

  • 1Gordian Health Solutions, Inc., Franklin, Tennessee, USA. along@gordian-health.com

Disease Management : DM
|June 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Domain Knowledge, Digital Interactions, and Analytics: A Multifaceted Approach to Developing a Population Health Program.

Population health management·2021
Same author

The Association Between Incentive Designs and Health Assessment or Biometric Screening Completion.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2019
Same author

Evidence-Based Nonpharmacologic Strategies for Comprehensive Pain Care: The Consortium Pain Task Force White Paper.

Explore (New York, N.Y.)·2018
Same author

Outcomes Across the Value Chain for a Comprehensive Employee Health and Wellness Intervention: A Cohort Study by Degrees of Health Engagement.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2016
Same author

The Stock Performance of C. Everett Koop Award Winners Compared With the Standard & Poor's 500 Index.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2015
Same author

Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work?

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2014

Evaluating care management programs involves diverse experts, leading to challenges in measuring outcomes. This study addresses these difficulties and recommends standardizing evaluation methods for clinical and economic efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Health Economics
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • Care management program evaluations involve interdisciplinary teams from finance, medicine, and social sciences.
  • Differing scientific philosophies and assumptions among these constituents can create challenges and conflict.
  • The variety of care management programs complicates outcome measurement, leading to ongoing debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the processes involved in care management program evaluations.
  • To assess the current state of evaluation methodologies in the industry.
  • To provide recommendations for standardizing evaluation approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and industry practices in care management program evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of challenges in clinical and economic outcome measurement.
  • Development of recommendations for standardized evaluation frameworks.

    • Main Results:

    • Evaluation processes are often complex and involve diverse stakeholder perspectives.
    • Standardization of clinical and economic evaluation methods remains a significant challenge.
    • Discrepancies in assumptions and philosophies hinder consensus on best practices.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardizing evaluation methodology is crucial for improving the rigor and comparability of care management program assessments.
    • Addressing interdisciplinary differences is key to developing unified evaluation approaches.
    • Further research and collaboration are needed to establish industry-wide standards.