Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Generalization decrement in human contingency learning.

Daniel S Wheeler1, Jeffrey C Amundson, Ralph R Miller

  • 1State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York 3902-6000, USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|June 14, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the generality of behavioral theory and abstract phenomena.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2026
Same author

Comparisons of extinction, counterconditioning, and novelty-facilitated extinction within ABA vs. ABC renewal designs.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same author

Aversion-induced dopamine reductions predict drug-taking and escape behaviors.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2025
Same author

Rethinking memory impairments: Retrieval failure.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Contextual modulation of human associative learning following novelty-facilitated extinction, counterconditioning, and conventional extinction.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2024
Same author

Aversion-induced drug taking and escape behavior involve similar nucleus accumbens core dopamine signaling signatures.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

This study explored how changes to cues affect learning generalization. Removing elements from a cue configuration resulted in a larger generalization decrement than adding elements, impacting associative learning.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Learning Theory
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Stimulus generalization is a fundamental concept in learning theory, describing how learned associations extend to novel stimuli.
  • A generalization decrement occurs when responding to a novel cue differs from responding to the original learned cue.
  • Understanding factors influencing generalization decrement is crucial for refining models of associative learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how altering cue configurations by adding or removing elements impacts the generalization decrement.
  • To compare the magnitude of generalization decrement resulting from cue addition versus cue subtraction.
  • To evaluate the findings in the context of Pearce's and Wagner's models of stimulus generalization.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two experiments utilizing a contingency learning task with human participants.
  • Participants learned associations between cue configurations and outcomes.
  • The size of the generalization decrement was measured when presented with novel, altered cue configurations.

Main Results:

  • Removing elements from a learned cue configuration produced a more substantial generalization decrement compared to adding elements.
  • The generalization decrement observed after adding elements was unlikely attributable to competing orienting responses.
  • Differential effects on generalization decrement were observed based on whether cue elements were added or removed.

Conclusions:

  • Cue subtraction leads to a more robust generalization decrement than cue addition in associative learning.
  • The findings provide empirical support for contrasting predictions derived from Pearce's and Wagner's theoretical models of stimulus generalization.
  • This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of how stimulus composition influences the generalization of learned associations.