[Effect of Guanfu Base A in patients with ventricular arrhythmias]
Yan-min Yang1, Jun Zhu, Xin Gao
1Department of Emergency, Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Heart Disease Hospital, CAMS and PUMC, Beijing 100037, China.
Insights
Intravenous Guanfu Base A hydrochloride (GFA) effectively controls premature ventricular contractions, showing comparable results to propafenone. GFA also demonstrated better patient tolerance and fewer severe adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Ventricular arrhythmias pose a significant clinical challenge.
- Current treatments require careful consideration of efficacy and safety profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous Guanfu Base A hydrochloride (GFA) for treating ventricular arrhythmias.
- To compare GFA with propafenone, a known antiarrhythmic agent.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study involving 201 patients with ventricular arrhythmias.
- Patients received either intravenous GFA or propafenone, followed by a 6-hour infusion.
- Efficacy was assessed via 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic monitoring; safety was evaluated through vital signs and adverse event documentation.
Main Results:
- GFA demonstrated comparable efficacy to propafenone in reducing premature ventricular contractions and overall ventricular ectopy.
- While not statistically significant (P = 0.0609), GFA showed a trend towards greater effectiveness in reducing ventricular ectopy.
- GFA exhibited better patient tolerance and a lower incidence of less severe adverse events compared to propafenone.
Conclusions:
- Intravenous GFA is a viable treatment option for premature ventricular contractions, offering efficacy comparable to propafenone.
- GFA presents an improved safety and tolerability profile over propafenone for managing ventricular arrhythmias.
Objective:
To investigate the effect and safety of intravenous Guanfu Base A hydrochloride (GFA) in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.
Methods:
Patients without severe structural heart disease presenting with equal or more than 150 premature ventricular contractions per hour and/or non sustained ventricular tachycardia in drug-free holter monitoring were recruited in this double blind randomized active-controlled study. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive GFA or propafenone intravenously by a proportion of 1:1 in a double-blind manner. Intravenous bolus of the study medicine was given, followed by maintenance infusion for 6 hours. 24 hours continuous electrocardiographic recordings were performed to evaluate the efficacy. Vital signs, electrocardiograms and adverse events were documented before, during and after drug administration.
Results:
A total of 201 patients came from eight centres were randomized to GFA or propafenone group. The demographic characteristics, the extent of ventricular arrhythmias and baseline clinical findings were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the percentage of reducing premature ventricular contractions and the accumulated efficacy between two groups. GFA had tendency to be more effective than propafenone in reducing the number of ventricular ectopy (P = 0.0609). There were no significant differences in the onset of action after drug administration between two drugs. The tolerance of GFA was better than propafenone. The adverse events in GFA group were less severe than those in propafenone group.
Conclusions:
Intravenous GFA in controlling the premature ventricular contraction has comparable effect to IV propafenone. Tolerance of GFA was better than propafenone.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
