Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determining a one-tailed upper limit for future sample relative reproducibility standard deviations.

Foster D McClure1, Jung K Lee

  • 1U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Scientific Analysis and Support, Division of Mathematics, Department of Health and Human Services, College Park, MD 20740-3835, USA. foster.mcclure@cfsan.fda.gov

Journal of AOAC International
|June 27, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-Laboratory Study of Five Methods for the Determination of Brevetoxins in Shellfish Tissue Extracts.

Harmful algae 2002 : proceedings of the Xth International Conference on Harmful Algae, St. Pete Beach, Florida, USA, October 21-25, 2002. International Conference on Harmful Algae (10th : 2002 : St. Pete Beach, Florida)·2015
Same author

Use of prediction methods to assess laboratory bias and mean values associated with an interlaboratory study for method validation and/or proficiency testing.

Journal of AOAC International·2014
Same author

Variances and uncertainties of the sample laboratory-to-laboratory variance (S(L)2) and standard deviation (S(L)) associated with an interlaboratory study.

Journal of AOAC International·2012
Same author

Determination of operating characteristic, retesting, and testing amount probabilities associated with testing for the presence of Salmonella in foods.

Journal of AOAC International·2011
Same author

Determination of a two-tailed 100(1-alpha)% upper limit on the relative error in the laboratory-to-laboratory standard deviation obtained from an interlaboratory study.

Journal of AOAC International·2009
Same author

On using a normal approximation for the noncentral t-distribution in determining upper limits for future sample relative repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations.

Journal of AOAC International·2009

A new formula calculates upper limits for future relative standard deviations in reproducibility. This helps predict measurement variability and ensure data reliability in scientific studies.

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Metrology
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Reproducibility is crucial for validating analytical methods.
  • Estimating future measurement variability is essential for quality control.
  • Existing methods may not adequately account for all sources of variation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a formula for calculating a one-tailed upper limit for future percent relative reproducibility standard deviations (RSD(R),%).
  • To provide a statistical tool for predicting measurement uncertainty.
  • To enhance the reliability of analytical data across different laboratories.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a formula based on sample repeatability variance and laboratory-to-laboratory variance.
  • The formula determines a 100p% upper limit for future RSD(R),% values.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized statistical principles to model the expected distribution of reproducibility data.

    • Main Results:

    • A practical formula was derived to estimate upper bounds for RSD(R),%.
    • The method accounts for both within-lab and between-lab variability.
    • The developed formula provides a probabilistic estimate for future measurement performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The new formula offers a robust method for assessing future reproducibility.
    • This tool can aid in setting appropriate acceptance criteria for analytical methods.
    • Improved prediction of measurement variability enhances confidence in scientific findings.