Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Student t Distribution

Student t Distribution

The population standard deviation is rarely known in many day-to-day examples of statistics. When the sample sizes are large, it is easy to estimate the population standard deviation using a confidence interval, which provides results close enough to the original value. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
The Student t distribution was developed by William S. Goset (1876–1937) of the...

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...

Central Limit Theorem

Central Limit Theorem

The central limit theorem, abbreviated as clt, is one of the most powerful and useful ideas in all of statistics. The central limit theorem for sample means says that if you repeatedly draw samples of a given size and calculate their means, and create a histogram of those means, then the resulting histogram will tend to have an approximate normal bell shape. In other words, as sample sizes increase, the distribution of means follows the normal distribution more closely.
The sample size, n, that...

Choosing Between z and t Distribution

Choosing Between z and t Distribution

The z and the Student t distribution estimate the population mean using the sample mean and standard deviation. However, to decide which distribution to use for a calculation, one needs to determine the sample size, the nature of the distribution, and whether the population standard deviation is known. If the population standard deviation is known and the population is normally distributed, or if the sample size is greater than 30, the z distribution is preferred. The Student t distribution is...

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Multi-Laboratory Study of Five Methods for the Determination of Brevetoxins in Shellfish Tissue Extracts.

Harmful algae 2002 : proceedings of the Xth International Conference on Harmful Algae, St. Pete Beach, Florida, USA, October 21-25, 2002. International Conference on Harmful Algae (10th : 2002 : St. Pete Beach, Florida)·2015

Same author

Use of prediction methods to assess laboratory bias and mean values associated with an interlaboratory study for method validation and/or proficiency testing.

Journal of AOAC International·2014

Same author

Variances and uncertainties of the sample laboratory-to-laboratory variance (S(L)2) and standard deviation (S(L)) associated with an interlaboratory study.

Journal of AOAC International·2012

Same author

Determination of operating characteristic, retesting, and testing amount probabilities associated with testing for the presence of Salmonella in foods.

Journal of AOAC International·2011

Same author

Determination of a two-tailed 100(1-alpha)% upper limit on the relative error in the laboratory-to-laboratory standard deviation obtained from an interlaboratory study.

Journal of AOAC International·2009

Same author

Uncertainties of method performance statistics based on a balanced completely randomized model interlaboratory study.

Journal of AOAC International·2008

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

On using a normal approximation for the noncentral t-distribution in determining upper limits for future sample

Foster D McClure¹, Jung K Lee

¹U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, DHHS, Office of Food Defense, Communication and Emergency Response, Division of Public Health and Biostatistics, College Park, MD 20740-3835, USA. fdmc5100@yahoo.com

Journal of AOAC International

|April 29, 2009

Summary

New formulas provide accurate upper limits for future sample relative repeatability and relative reproducibility standard deviations (RSDr and RSDR) using a normal approximation. These methods enhance statistical analysis for collaborative studies under a randomized model.

More Related Videos

A Validatable Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Bioshedding Studies of Tears

A Validatable Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Bioshedding Studies of Tears

Published on: July 14, 2023

Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles (TRECs) and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles (KRECs) by Real-time PCR

Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles (TRECs) and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles (KRECs) by Real-time PCR

Published on: December 6, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

A Validatable Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Bioshedding Studies of Tears

A Validatable Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Bioshedding Studies of Tears

Published on: July 14, 2023

Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles (TRECs) and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles (KRECs) by Real-time PCR

Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles (TRECs) and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles (KRECs) by Real-time PCR

Published on: December 6, 2014

Area of Science:

Statistics
Analytical Chemistry
Quality Control

Background:

Relative repeatability standard deviation (RSDr) and relative reproducibility standard deviation (RSDR) are crucial metrics for assessing measurement variability in collaborative studies.
Accurate estimation of upper limits for these parameters is essential for setting appropriate quality control standards.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate formulas for computing one-tailed upper limits of future sample RSDr and RSDR.
To assess the accuracy of these formulas using a normal approximation for the noncentral t-distribution.

Main Methods:

Development of formulas based on a normal approximation for the noncentral t-distribution.
Computation of 100p% one-tailed upper limits for future sample RSDr and RSDR under a completely randomized model.
Accuracy assessment by comparing computed limits with those from normal approximation and Monte Carlo simulations.

Main Results:

Formulas were developed to compute one-tailed upper limits for future sample RSDr and RSDR.
The accuracy of the normal approximation for RSDr upper limits was evaluated.
The accuracy of the normal approximation for RSDR upper limits was assessed via Monte Carlo simulation.

Conclusions:

The developed formulas offer a reliable method for estimating upper limits of RSDr and RSDR.
The normal approximation provides an accurate approach for assessing these variability metrics in collaborative studies.