Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An environmental decision framework applied to marine engine control technologies.

James J Corbett1, David Chapman

  • 1College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. jcorbett@udel.edu

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)
|June 30, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An umbrella protocol for the clinical evaluation of diagnostics in infectious disease.

Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2026
Same author

Sleep-Like Slow Waves during Wakefulness Mediate Attention and Vigilance Difficulties in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

A High-Precision Time-Varying Survival Model for Early Prediction of Patient Deterioration: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Nonlocal current-driven heat flow in ideal plasmas.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

ADHD in females: Survey findings on symptoms across hormonal life stages.

Journal of psychiatric research·2025
Same author

Late-Onset Isolated Drain Site Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Managed by a Multidisciplinary Approach.

Cureus·2025
Same journal

Urban ozone nonattainment: Interconnected challenges in the Intermountain Western U.S.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

DynLink-AQ: Adaptive inter-station connectivity for multi-pollutant, multi-horizon air quality forecasting across Delhi.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

Polonium-210 levels in placental maternal-fetal barrier: A pilot study conducted in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

China's carbon emissions trading system (ETS) helps the country slow down industrial solid waste accumulation.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

Pyrolysis technologies for valorisation of healthcare waste: A review on processes, products, and challenges.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

PM<sub>2.5</sub> removal efficiency by an urban green landscape: Effect of planting design and environmental factors.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a flexible decision framework to help marine operators select emission control technologies. It uses decision theory to objectively evaluate options, aiding in reducing vessel air pollution.

Area of Science:

  • Marine Engineering
  • Environmental Science
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Marine engines contribute significantly to air pollution.
  • Selecting appropriate emission control technologies is complex.
  • Existing methods may lack transparency and adaptability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a structured decision framework for evaluating marine emission control technologies.
  • To provide a transparent and adaptable tool for vessel operators and stakeholders.
  • To facilitate informed choices for reducing air pollution from marine vessels.

Main Methods:

  • Application of standard decision theory principles.
  • Development of an open-structure framework with adaptable attributes and objectives.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Integration of scoring techniques and expected value decision structure.
  • Inclusion of net present value for cost analysis and iterative screening processes.

    • Main Results:

    • The framework offers a transparent method for comparing emission control technologies.
    • It allows for subjective judgments to be quantified and biases minimized.
    • The iterative approach ensures alternatives meet minimum acceptance criteria.
    • Stakeholders can clearly understand the rationale behind technology choices.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed decision framework effectively supports marine operators in selecting emission control technologies.
    • The adaptable structure allows for customization to specific vessel and technology attributes.
    • This approach enhances clarity and consensus among stakeholders regarding pollution reduction strategies.
    • The framework's principles can be extended to other marine environmental control applications.