Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

11:51
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface
J A Grant1, N E Bishop, N Götzen
1Biomechanics Section, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 15, Hamburg D-21073, Germany.
Journal of Biomechanics
|June 30, 2006
Summary
Artificial bone models show lower friction coefficients than human bone, especially for dry surfaces. This impacts pre-clinical implant testing, highlighting the need to consider surface finish and lubrication.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Orthopedic Engineering
- Tribology
Background:
- Artificial bone (Sawbones) is widely used in implant testing for consistency.
- Friction coefficients are crucial for load transfer in uncemented implants.
- Limited data exists comparing friction between human and artificial bone under varying conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare static and dynamic friction coefficients between artificial and human trabecular bone.
- To evaluate the influence of titanium surface finish, lubrication (wet/dry), and normal stress on friction.
- To assess the suitability of artificial bone in pre-clinical implant load transfer studies.
Main Methods:
- Tested static and dynamic friction coefficients of four titanium surfaces (polished, Al2O3 blasted, plasma sprayed, beaded) on artificial bone (Sawbones) and human trabecular bone.
- Varied normal interface stress (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 MPa) under dry and wet conditions.
- Analyzed friction coefficients using statistical significance (alpha<0.05).
Main Results:
- Friction coefficients were generally lower for artificial bone compared to human bone.
- Dry polished artificial bone surfaces showed significantly lower static friction (20% of human bone).
- Dry beaded artificial bone surfaces showed 42-61% of human bone static friction.
- Dynamic friction differences were less pronounced.
- Normal stress and wet/dry conditions had significant but non-systematic effects.
Conclusions:
- Artificial bone models may not accurately replicate friction characteristics of human bone, particularly for specific surface finishes.
- Pre-clinical implant testing relying on interface load transfer is sensitive to artificial bone's surface properties and lubrication.
- Results suggest caution when extrapolating findings from artificial bone to in vivo scenarios regarding load transfer and mechanical integrity.

