Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

External dose estimation for nuclear worker studies.

E S Gilbert1, I Thierry-Chef, E Cardis

  • 1Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. gilberte@mail.nih.gov

Radiation Research
|July 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HARMONIC organ dose calculation framework for cardiac fluoroscopy.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2026
Same author

Doses from ionising radiation in paediatric cardiac catheterisations in Norway 1975-2021.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2024
Same author

Finite-Sample Bias of the Linear Excess Relative Risk in Cohort Studies of Computed Tomography-Related Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Radiation research·2024
Same author

Mental health and COVID-19 in a general population cohort in Spain (COVICAT study).

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2022
Same author

Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: Results from the international MOBI-Kids study.

Environment international·2022
Same author

Rhamnus prinoides (gesho) stem extract prevents co-culture biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans.

Letters in applied microbiology·2020
Same journal

KRT6A Impairs Radiosensitivity in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Enhancing Fatty Acid Synthesis.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Chromosomal Instability: A Potential Biomarker of Radiation Response.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Antioxidant Probucol Reduces Mortality in Mice Exposed to Lethal Doses of Ionizing Radiation.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

The Detection of Radiation Effects in the Urine of Rhesus Macaques Using Raman Spectroscopy.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Characterization of Radiation-responsive Genes and Transcript Variants under Different Radiation Qualities, Doses and Dose Rates.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Methyl Quercetin Inhibits Radiation-induced Senescence and TGF-β1-induced Myofibroblast Differentiation Through Psmad3/TGF-Β Signaling.

Radiation research·2026
See all related articles

Epidemiological studies on nuclear workers provide valuable data on low-dose radiation health effects. This research quantifies dosimetry errors to improve risk assessments for radiation exposure.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation epidemiology
  • Occupational health
  • Dosimetry science

Background:

  • Epidemiological studies of nuclear workers are crucial for understanding low-dose radiation health effects.
  • Objective dose measurements using personal dosimeters offer advantages but require careful consideration of biases and uncertainties.
  • Valid comparisons with other radiation exposure groups (e.g., atomic bomb survivors) necessitate accurate dose estimations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss sources of error in worker dose estimates.
  • To describe efforts made to quantify these errors in epidemiological studies.
  • To improve the accuracy of risk assessments for radiation exposure in nuclear workers.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a large collaborative study of nuclear workers across 15 countries, coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focused on penetrating gamma radiation (100 keV to 3 MeV) and included questionnaires on dosimetry practices, detailed exposure condition studies (nuclear power plants and mixed activity facilities), and laboratory testing of historical dosimeter designs.
  • Developed facility- and calendar year-specific adjustment factors based on the findings.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified and quantified various sources of error in worker dose estimates.
    • Established adjustment factors to refine dose estimations for specific facilities and time periods.
    • Enhanced the reliability of expressing radiation risks as functions of organ doses.

    Conclusions:

    • Quantifying dosimetry errors is essential for accurate epidemiological studies of nuclear workers.
    • The developed adjustment factors increase confidence in risk assessments derived from occupational radiation exposure data.
    • This work supports more precise comparisons between different radiation exposure studies.