Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cooperation should not be assumed.

John M McNamara1, Ken Binmore, Alasdair I Houston

  • 1Centre for Behavioural Biology, Department of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TW, UK.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|July 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-control: changing our perspective on performance.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Optimal diving: patch quality, depth, and marginal value.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2025
Same author

Optimal competitors: the balance of attraction and choices of mutualists, like pollinators, drives facilitation and may promote crop pollination.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Scales of risk and adaptive 'dread': an evolutionary theory of risk inflation.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The evolutionary consequences of learning under competition.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2024
Same author

A critical review of risk-sensitive foraging.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2023

Non-cooperative game theory adequately explains sexual selection, challenging the view that cooperation is fundamental. Further research is needed for realistic evolutionary models of sex interactions.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Game theory
  • Behavioral ecology

Background:

  • Sexual selection is often viewed through the lens of competition.
  • A recent proposal suggests cooperation is fundamental to sexual selection, utilizing cooperative game theory.
  • This perspective, however, lacks consistent application and clear justification.

Discussion:

  • Non-cooperative game theory offers a sufficient framework for understanding sexual selection dynamics.
  • The role of bargaining in social interactions is acknowledged but not a novel concept.
  • Bargaining does not inherently necessitate or imply cooperation.

Key Insights:

  • Critique of the cooperative game theory approach to sexual selection.
  • Advocacy for the continued utility of non-cooperative game theory in this field.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on the need for more realistic evolutionary models.

    • Outlook:

    • Further development of non-cooperative game theory models for sexual selection.
    • Investigating bargaining dynamics without assuming cooperation.
    • Integrating realistic factors into evolutionary models of mating behavior.