Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

De-gassed water is a better cleaning agent.

R M Pashley1, M Rzechowicz, L R Pashley

  • 1Department of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. richard.pashley@anu.edu.au

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
|July 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This study shows that water without dissolved gases is better at cleaning oily or greasy substances. The improvement comes from reduced cavitation effects, which normally make it harder for oil droplets to mix with water. Removing gases from both the water and the oil increases cleaning effectiveness. The researchers suggest a new cleaning method that uses gas-free solvents and water. They also found that dissolved gases may affect water's electrical conductivity, suggesting a need for further study.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved virus inactivation using a hot bubble column evaporator (HBCE).

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2018
Same author

Low temperature MS2 (ATCC15597-B1) virus inactivation using a hot bubble column evaporator (HBCE).

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2016
Same author

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Eggerthella lenta bacteremia.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2014
Same author

Cross protection of a Mannheimia haemolytica A1 Lkt-/Pasteurella multocida ΔhyaE bovine respiratory disease vaccine against experimental challenge with Mannheimia haemolytica A6 in calves.

Vaccine·2012
Same author

Rat bite fever as a presenting illness in a patient with AIDS.

Infection·2011
Same author

Synthetic peptides.

Methods in molecular medicine·2011

Area of Science:

  • Surface chemistry and fluid dynamics
  • Environmental engineering and cleaning technologies
  • Colloid and interface science

Background:

Cleaning processes often rely on surfactants to disperse hydrophobic substances in water. Prior research has shown that dissolved gases can influence surface interactions. However, the role of dissolved gases in cleaning efficiency remains unclear. No prior work had resolved whether removing gases could enhance dispersion. This gap motivated a closer examination of gas effects on hydrophobic droplet behavior. It was already known that cavitation can hinder dispersion, but its exact role was uncertain. This uncertainty led to investigations into gas-free water's potential as a cleaner. The findings may reshape assumptions about gas-water interactions in cleaning.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim was to test whether de-gassed water improves the dispersion of hydrophobic substances. The study sought to determine if gas removal reduces cavitation effects. Researchers wanted to explore a detergent-free cleaning alternative. They also aimed to assess gas effects on water's electrical conductivity. The motivation stemmed from gaps in understanding gas-water interactions. The study focused on oil and water systems as a model. It proposed a novel cleaning process using de-gassed solvents and water. The goal was to evaluate practical applications of gas-free water.

Keywords:
De-gassed waterHydrophobic cleaningCavitation effectsDetergent-free cleaning

Frequently Asked Questions

De-gassed water reduces cavitation effects, which otherwise hinder dispersion of hydrophobic droplets.

Dissolved gases increase cavitation, which opposes dispersion of hydrophobic liquids into water.

De-gassing the oil enhances cleaning effectiveness by further reducing cavitation effects.

The process uses a de-gassed hydrophobic solvent followed by rinsing in de-gassed water.

The study suggests dissolved gases may influence water's electrical conductivity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The researchers tested water with and without dissolved gases. They observed how hydrophobic liquids dispersed in each case. A controlled setup allowed comparison of dispersion rates. They used liquid hydrocarbons and oils as test substances. Cavitation effects were measured using imaging techniques. Electrical conductivity was also assessed in both conditions. The study combined experimental observation with theoretical analysis. Results were compared to baseline values from prior studies.

Main Results:

De-gassed water dispersed hydrophobic liquids more effectively than regular water. The improvement was attributed to reduced cavitation effects. Removing gases enhanced the dispersion of oil droplets. Further de-gassing of the oil increased cleaning effectiveness. The electrical conductivity of water was also affected by dissolved gases. These findings suggest gas removal could optimize cleaning processes. The results support a detergent-free cleaning method. The study provides a basis for developing new cleaning technologies.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that gas removal improves cleaning by reducing cavitation effects. They suggest a new method using de-gassed solvents and water. This approach may offer a detergent-free cleaning alternative. The findings highlight the role of dissolved gases in dispersion. The study supports further exploration of gas-free water applications. The electrical conductivity findings suggest a need for reevaluation. The results align with prior knowledge about cavitation effects. The authors emphasize the potential of this method for practical use.

The authors propose a detergent-free cleaning method based on gas removal.