Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Sanity and madness.

Neville Symington¹

¹nevillesymington@hotmail.com

The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis

|August 1, 2006

Summary

This study explores the nature of madness, its impact on freedom, and patient motivations for sanity. It proposes revising Freudian principles to prioritize the desire for freedom over the pleasure principle.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A technique for facilitating the creation of mind.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2007

Same author

Two sessions with Lawrence.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2004

Same author

Response to Annie Anargyros-Klinger's 'Depression and Leo Tolstoy'.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2003

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Psychology
Psychoanalysis
Philosophy of Mind

Background:

Understanding the nature of madness is crucial for mental health.
Freud's pleasure principle and determinism have historically dominated psychological thought.
The concept of freedom is central to human experience and motivation.

Purpose of the Study:

To illuminate the nature of madness and its detrimental effects on personal freedom.
To explore the underlying reasons for patients' desire to regain sanity.
To propose a revised psychological framework for understanding motivation.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of psychoanalytic theories.
Development of a theoretical schema.
Critique of Freudian principles (pleasure principle, determinism).

Main Results:

Madness is presented as a force that undermines individual freedom.
The desire for sanity is linked to a fundamental drive for freedom.
A new motivational principle, the desire for freedom, is proposed.

Conclusions:

Freud's pleasure principle and determinism are insufficient to explain the desire for sanity.
The desire for freedom should be considered the dominant motivating principle in psychological theory.
A revised understanding of motivation is necessary to fully grasp the complexities of madness and sanity.

Related Experiment Videos