Related Experiment Videos
A study on FlexMaster : a Ni-Ti rotary engine driven system for root canal preparation.
M S Alam1, A K Bashar, J A Begumr
1Dept of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dental Faculty, BSM Medical University, Dhaka.
Mymensingh Medical Journal : MMJ
|August 1, 2006
Summary
The FlexMaster rotary system was faster but less effective at cleaning root canals than manual Flexofile instruments. Manual filing resulted in significantly less debris in the apical region, indicating better cleaning performance despite taking longer.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Dental Materials Science
Background:
- Root canal preparation aims to clean and shape the canal system.
- Nickel Titanium instruments offer flexibility and efficiency in endodontic procedures.
- Evaluating new rotary systems against established hand files is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cleaning and shaping effectiveness of the Nickel Titanium FlexMaster engine-driven system with Nickel Titanium Flexofile hand instruments.
- To assess the time efficiency and procedural errors associated with each instrumentation technique.
Main Methods:
- 40 curved root canals (20-30 degrees) were divided into two groups: FlexMaster (rotary, crown-down) and Flexofile (hand, conventional/step-back).
- Irrigation with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA was performed.
- Preparation time and instrument separation were recorded.
- Longitudinal sections were examined under a scanning electron microscope for debris and smear layer in the apical region using a 5-score scale.
Main Results:
- Neither system achieved completely clean root canals or maintained original canal uniformity.
- Manual Flexofile technique resulted in significantly less apical debris and smear layer (p<0.05).
- FlexMaster instrumentation was significantly faster (p<0.01), but one file separated in a curved canal.
Conclusions:
- Manual Flexofile hand instrumentation demonstrated superior cleaning of the apical root canal region compared to the FlexMaster rotary system.
- While faster, the FlexMaster system was less effective in removing debris and smear layer.
- Both systems failed to completely clean and maintain the original canal morphology.