Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does questionnaire format impact reported partner violence rates?: An experimental study.

Sherry Hamby1, David B Sugarman, Sue Boney-McCoy

  • 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. sherry.hamby@unc.edu

Violence and Victims
|August 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Strengths Associated With Positive Youth Development After Child Maltreatment: Application of the Resilience Portfolio Model.

Child maltreatment·2026
Same author

Identifying factors associated with thriving after interpersonal trauma in a Canadian sample of adults.

Journal of health psychology·2026
Same author

From adversity to strength: Examining pathways to resilience and well-being in Kosovo.

Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy·2026
Same author

Psychosocial strengths associated with higher functioning after interpersonal adversity in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy·2026
Same author

Psychosocial Factors Associated With Higher Functioning After Interpersonal Adversity: A National Cross-Sectional U.S. Study.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2025
Same author

Resilience among survivors of campus sexual assault: a scoping review.

Journal of American college health : J of ACH·2025
Same journal

Considering Exceptional Circumstance Withdrawal Policies for Student Victims Through a Trauma-Informed Lens: A Brief Report.

Violence and victims·2026
Same journal

The Role of Masculine Honor Beliefs in the Perceptions of a Father's Violent Retaliation Against His Child's Sexual Abuser.

Violence and victims·2026
Same journal

Teen Dating Violence Victimization and School Outcomes in the United States: The Moderating Effects of Risk Factors.

Violence and victims·2026
Same journal

Exploring Dimensions of Economic Abuse Within Adolescent Romantic Relationships.

Violence and victims·2026
Same journal

Childhood Maltreatment, Self-Esteem, and Intimate Partner Violence in a Clinical Sample of Economically Marginalized African American Women.

Violence and victims·2026
Same journal

Violence Experiences and Risk for Homicide Among Intimate Partner Violence Shelter Residents.

Violence and victims·2026
See all related articles

Questionnaire format impacts partner violence reporting. Standard categories yielded more disclosures than yes/no, but sexual coercion rates varied by format and gender.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Criminology
  • Survey Methodology

Background:

  • Partner violence is assessed using various survey methods.
  • The impact of questionnaire design on violence disclosure rates is understudied.
  • Understanding measurement variability is crucial for accurate research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of different questionnaire formats on reporting intimate partner violence.
  • To examine the influence of response categories (standard vs. dichotomous) and administration methods (computer vs. paper-and-pencil).
  • To investigate gender differences in reporting rates across formats.

Main Methods:

  • A 2x2 experimental design was employed with 160 undergraduate students.
  • Paper-and-pencil versus computer administrations were compared.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Standard Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) categories were contrasted with dichotomous (yes/no) response options.
  • Main Results:

    • Sexual coercion rates exhibited greater measurement variability compared to psychological aggression, physical assault, or injury.
    • Gender moderated the effects observed for sexual coercion.
    • Standard CTS2 categories led to higher disclosure rates for certain variables than dichotomous categories.
    • Computer and paper-and-pencil formats showed minimal differences in reporting.

    Conclusions:

    • While all tested formats have utility, questionnaire design significantly influences violence disclosure rates, particularly for sexual coercion.
    • Gender differences in reporting sexual coercion highlight the need for nuanced analysis.
    • Further research into questionnaire design's effect on violence disclosure is essential for improving data accuracy.