Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Separate neural pathways process different decision costs.

Peter H Rudebeck1, Mark E Walton, Angharad N Smyth

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK. peter.rudebeck@psy.ox.ac.uk

Nature Neuroscience
|August 22, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic geometry remapping of neural activity within frontal and subcortical areas during decision-making.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Interpretable abstractions of artificial neural networks predict behavior and neural activity during human information gathering.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in macaques guides decisions in different learning conditions.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Deep brain stimulation induces white matter remodeling and functional changes to brain-wide networks.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Low-intensity focused ultrasound to human amygdala reveals a causal role in ambiguous emotion processing and alters local and network activity.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Dataset of cortical and subcortical single neuron activity during value-based tasks in macaque monkey.

Scientific data·2026
Same journal

Author Correction: Spinal cord Tau pathology induces tactile deficits and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease via dysregulation of CCK neurons.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Hippocampal theta sweeps indicate goal direction during navigation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Just how goal-directed are hippocampal theta sweeps, anyway?

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Goal-directed hippocampal theta sweeps during memory-guided navigation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Connectomic evidence that ordered activity drives neuromuscular network formation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Noninvasive decoding of typed sentences from human brain activity.

Nature neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Decision-making involves weighing costs and rewards. Two independent brain systems, one for effort and one for delay, control these decisions, with specific frontal lobe areas crucial for each.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Economics

Background:

  • Decision-making research often focuses on rewards, but costs significantly influence choices.
  • Neuroscientific evidence on the role of frontal brain areas in decision-making is contradictory.
  • Understanding the neural basis of cost-benefit analysis is crucial for explaining various behavioral patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct roles of frontal lobe regions in decision-making related to effort and delay costs.
  • To determine if separate neural systems govern decisions involving different types of costs.
  • To explore the implications of these findings for understanding neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Main Methods:

  • Lesion studies in rats targeting specific frontal lobe areas: anterior cingulate cortex and orbitofrontal cortex.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessing decisions related to effort investment for rewards.
  • Assessing decisions related to waiting time (delay) for rewards.

    • Main Results:

    • Anterior cingulate cortex lesions impaired effort-based decision-making.
    • Orbitofrontal cortex lesions impaired delay-based decision-making.
    • The observed deficits suggest a role for impaired associative learning in both systems.

    Conclusions:

    • Decision-making involves at least two independent systems within the frontal lobes, one for effort costs and one for delay costs.
    • These findings challenge existing economic models of decision-making.
    • Impairments in these systems may contribute to apathy and impulsivity seen in various disorders.