Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026
06:57
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
Published on: August 9, 2016
Individual differences in chess expertise: a psychometric investigation
Roland H Grabner1, Elsbeth Stern, Aljoscha C Neubauer
1Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz 2/III, A-8010 Graz, Austria. ro.grabner@uni-graz.at
Acta Psychologica
|September 1, 2006
Summary
Chess expertise is moderately linked to intelligence and strongly to chess experience. Individual differences in chess skill are complex, influenced by cognitive abilities, motivation, and extensive practice.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psychometrics
- Expert Performance Research
Background:
- Debates exist regarding the influence of general individual characteristics, particularly intelligence, on achieving expert performance levels.
- Understanding the factors contributing to expertise in complex domains like chess is crucial for both theoretical and practical applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive psychometric investigation into individual differences in chess expertise.
- To examine the roles of general intelligence, personality traits, and chess-specific experience in predicting playing strength.
Main Methods:
- A sample of 90 adult tournament chess players (ELO 1311-2387) was assessed.
- Psychometric tests evaluated intelligence and personality variables.
- Data on chess experience, tournament participation, and practice were collected and analyzed using correlation and regression.
Main Results:
- A moderate positive correlation was found between general intelligence (especially numerical) and chess playing strength.
- Chess experience emerged as the strongest predictor of expertise, underscoring the importance of long-term engagement.
- Performance motivation and emotion control were the only personality factors that incrementally predicted playing strength.
- Chess experience, tournament activity, intelligence, and personality collectively explained approximately 55% of the variance in chess expertise.
Conclusions:
- Chess expertise is not solely determined by domain-specific experience but is significantly influenced by general cognitive abilities.
- Individual differences in chess expertise are multifaceted, involving a combination of intelligence, experience, motivation, and emotional regulation.
More Related Videos
06:52Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
Published on: September 17, 2019
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
01:29Measures of Intelligence
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
01:29Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
01:23Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
David Wechsler, a psychologist who worked with World War I veterans, developed a significant IQ test in 1939 called the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. This test was innovative because it combined several subtests that measured both verbal and nonverbal skills, reflecting Wechsler's belief that intelligence is a global capacity involving purposeful action, rational thinking, and effective interaction with the environment. This test later evolved into the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale...
01:30Biological Influences on Intelligence
Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter more...
01:29Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck
Hans and Sybil Eysenck developed a widely recognized theory of personality, which emphasizes the role of temperament and genetically based differences in shaping individual traits. Their theory posits that biological factors primarily determine personality and can be understood through two main dimensions: extroversion/introversion and neuroticism/stability.
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...