Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vertical bone augmentation: where are we now?

Simon Bernstein1, Jason Cooke, Paul Fotek

  • 1Department of Periodontics/Prevention/Geriatrics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078, USA.

Implant Dentistry
|September 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential of Using an Implant Fixture as a Ridge Expander for Minor Ridge Augmentation: An Ex Vivo Randomized Controlled Study.

The Journal of oral implantology·2020
Same author

Aesthetic-And patient-related outcomes following root coverage procedures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2020
Same author

Use of platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical oral investigations·2020
Same author

Dose-dependent effect of smoking and smoking cessation on periodontitis-related tooth loss during 10 - 47 years periodontal maintenance-A retrospective study in compliant cohort.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2020
Same author

Denture scanning technique for computer-guided implant-supported restoration treatment of edentulous patients.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2020
Same author

Capnography monitoring in procedural intravenous sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical oral investigations·2020
Same journal

Fifteen-Year Follow-up of Short Dental Implants in the Completely Edentulous Jaw: Submerged Versus Nonsubmerged Healing.

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

Effect of 5 Popular Disinfection Methods on Microflora of Laboratory: Customized Implant Abutments.

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

Implant Specialization: A Logical Progression or a Quagmire?

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

Indirect Sinus Augmentation With and Without the Addition of a Biomaterial: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

2019 Concluding Editorial.

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

Chemical Stability and Antimicrobial Activity of Plasma-Sprayed Cerium Oxide-Incorporated Calcium Silicate Coating in Dental Implants.

Implant dentistry·2019
See all related articles

Vertical bone augmentation techniques like guided-bone regeneration, monocortical onlay grafting, and distraction osteogenesis are reviewed. Distraction osteogenesis offers the greatest vertical bone gain for dental implants.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Increasing dental implant prevalence necessitates bone augmentation.
  • Vertical bone loss presents a significant surgical challenge for implant placement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing techniques for vertical bone augmentation prior to dental implant placement.
  • To compare the efficacy and potential complications of different vertical augmentation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE database from 1970 to 2004.
  • Review and summarization of articles focusing on vertical bone augmentation strategies.

Main Results:

  • Guided-bone regeneration, monocortical onlay grafting, and distraction osteogenesis are viable vertical augmentation techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Distraction osteogenesis demonstrates the highest potential for vertical bone gain.
  • Guided-bone regeneration and monocortical onlay grafting yield comparable vertical augmentation results.

    • Conclusions:

    • The selection of a vertical bone augmentation technique depends on patient-specific factors.
    • Considerations include existing anatomy, degree of vertical deficiency, and patient commitment.
    • Each technique offers unique dimensional gains, bone quality outcomes, and complication profiles.