Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report

Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report

A hand-off report, also known as a change-of-shift report, is a crucial nursing process that ensures the smooth transition of patient care responsibilities between nursing staff.
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.

Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

Vigilant monitoring for aneurysm rupture is essential for patients undergoing aortic surgery.Preoperative Nursing ManagementContinuously monitor the patient for manifestations of aneurysm rupture, such as pallor, weakness, tachycardia, hypotension, abdominal, back, groin, or periumbilical pain, changes in consciousness, and a pulsating abdominal mass. Regularly assess the patient's peripheral pulses.Instruct the patient to consume a clear liquid diet the day before surgery and administer...

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

SBAR I: Understanding the Concept

SBAR I: Understanding the Concept

Effective communication among healthcare professionals during hand-off reporting is essential to delivering safe and continuous patient care. Common professional interactions include reports to healthcare team members, hand-off, and transfer reports. Nurses routinely report information to other healthcare team members and also urgently contact healthcare providers to report changes in patient status.
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Influence of Quantitative Variables on Residency Match: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Cureus·2026

Same author

Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation for Chronic Pancreatitis in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Pancreas·2025

Same author

Colo-salpingeal fistula: a rare gynecologic manifestation of diverticular disease.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2024

Same author

What Changed? Variables Associated With the General Surgery Match.

The Journal of surgical research·2024

Same author

What Should I Use? Impact of Adhesion Barriers on Postoperative Abdominal Complications: A Systematic Review.

The American surgeon·2024

Same author

Endoscopic thyroidectomy: the development in a Chinese center.

Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A·2011

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

Overhead analysis in a surgical practice: a brief communication.

Eldo E Frezza¹

¹Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas 79415, USA. eldo.frezza@ttuhsc.edu

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A

|September 14, 2006

Summary

Surgeons can better understand practice profitability by analyzing overhead costs like insurance and supplies. Evaluating overhead as a percentage of net revenue or by comparing two years of financial data offers key insights.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

Area of Science:

Business Management
Surgical Practice Administration
Financial Analysis

Background:

Effective overhead management is crucial for surgical practice profitability.
Understanding the components of overhead allows for better financial control.
Increases in overhead do not always correlate with increased expenses.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide surgeons with methods for evaluating and understanding their practice's overhead.
To highlight key components of surgical practice overhead.
To offer strategies for assessing financial health and profitability.

Main Methods:

Analysis of overhead components including health insurance, overtime, supply costs, rent, marketing, telephone, and malpractice insurance.
Calculation of overhead as a percentage of net revenue.
Comparison of income and expenses over two years to determine variance and percentage of variance.

Main Results:

Identified key overhead cost areas for surgical practices.
Presented a method for calculating overhead as a percentage of net revenue.
Outlined a comparative financial analysis technique using two years of data.

Conclusions:

Regular evaluation of overhead is essential for surgeons to grasp practice profitability.
Calculating overhead as a percent of net revenue is a valuable assessment tool.
Year-over-year financial variance analysis provides critical insights into practice performance.