Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Reversible, Non-invasive Method for Airway Resistance Measurements and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sampling in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2010
Airway eosinophilia in children with severe asthma: predictive values of noninvasive tests
Christiane Lex1, Flavia Ferreira, Angela Zacharasiewicz
1Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine at the Royal Brompton Hospital and National Heart and Lung Institute, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Insights
Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and sputum eosinophils show moderate agreement with bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophils in children with severe asthma. These markers offer good negative predictive value but poor positive predictive value for airway eosinophilia.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Respiratory Medicine
- Clinical Immunology
Background:
- Children with severe asthma often have persistent symptoms despite maximal treatment.
- Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and sputum eosinophils are used to guide steroid therapy.
- Reliability of FeNO and sputum eosinophils in predicting bronchoscopically assessed airway eosinophilia in children is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive accuracy of FeNO and sputum eosinophils for airway eosinophilia.
- To compare these markers against bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and endobronchial biopsy findings.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-seven children with moderate to severe persistent asthma participated.
- Measurements included FeNO, sputum eosinophils, bronchoscopy, BAL, and endobronchial biopsy within 24 hours.
Main Results:
- Significant correlations were observed between sputum eosinophils and BAL eosinophils (r=0.45) and FeNO (r=0.42).
- FeNO showed a stronger correlation with BAL eosinophils (r=0.54).
- Positive predictive value for elevated BAL eosinophils using sputum eosinophils was 75%; negative predictive value was 63%.
Conclusions:
- Moderate agreement exists between FeNO, sputum eosinophils, and BAL eosinophils.
- These markers demonstrate good negative predictive value but poor positive predictive value for mucosal eosinophilia.
Rationale:
Children with severe asthma experience persistent symptoms despite maximal conventional treatment. Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Fe(NO)) and sputum eosinophils are used as markers of airway inflammation to guide treatment with steroids, but no data are available on how reliable they are in predicting airway eosinophilia assessed bronchoscopically in these children.
Objectives:
To determine how Fe(NO) and sputum eosinophils predict airway eosinophilia measured in both bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and endobronchial biopsy.
Methods:
Twenty-seven children with moderate to severe persistent asthma attempted measurement of Fe(NO) and sputum eosinophils, followed by bronchoscopy, BAL, and endobronchial biopsy within 24 h.
Main Results:
Significant correlations were found between eosinophils in sputum and both BAL eosinophils (n = 20, r = 0.45, p = 0.045) and Fe(NO) (n = 23, r = 0.42, p = 0.049). The relationship between Fe(NO) and BAL eosinophils was also significant with a stronger correlation (n = 24, r = 0.54, p = 0.006). The positive predictive value (PPV) for increased sputum eosinophil percentage (> 2.5%) to detect elevated eosinophils in BAL (> 1.19%) was 75%; the negative predictive value (NPV) was 63%. All patients with both increased sputum eosinophils and an elevated Fe(NO) value (> 23 ppb) had elevated eosinophils in BAL (PPV, 100%); the NPV of these two markers was 65%. Eight of nine patients without any sputum eosinophils had normal subepithelial eosinophil numbers (< 1.2%; NPV, 89%). However, the PPV of any sputum eosinophils for increased subepithelial eosinophilia was only 36.4%.
Conclusions:
There was moderate agreement between both Fe(NO) and sputum eosinophils and BAL eosinophils. There was good NPV, but only poor PPV for these markers for mucosal eosinophilia.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Asthma I: Introduction
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
Asthma III: Clinical Manifestations
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
