Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Understanding Physical Activity Demands and Reported Perceptions of Fatigue in Children with Developmental Disabilities.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) paradox.

Bioinformation·2026

Same author

Risk group-4 virus emergent threats.

Bioinformation·2025

Same author

Regulation of inflammaging.

Bioinformation·2025

Same author

Protein disorder - function paradigm: Putative role in inflammation.

Bioinformation·2025

Same author

Artificial intelligence in systemic diagnostics: Applications in psychiatry, cardiology, dermatology and oral pathology.

Bioinformation·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Making clinical decisions using a clinical practice guideline.

Janet Bauer¹, Sue Spackman, Francesco Chiappelli

¹June and Paul Ehrlich Endowed Program in Geriatric Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, School of Dentistry, Division of Restorative Dentistry, 90095-1668, USA.

Journal of the California Dental Association

|September 26, 2006

Summary

This study presents a framework for using clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in patient care. It details a process for retrieving evidence and updating guidelines to optimize clinical decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Health Informatics
Clinical Decision Support
Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are crucial for evidence-based healthcare.
Effective implementation of CPGs requires robust methods for evidence retrieval and application.
Current processes for updating CPGs can be improved through systematic knowledge management.

Purpose of the Study:

To demonstrate the application of a CPG in a simulated patient case for clinical decision-making.
To present conceptualized knowledge management software templates for evidence retrieval and analysis.
To outline a process for individualizing and optimizing clinical decisions using best evidence.

Main Methods:

A simulated patient case was used to illustrate CPG application.
Knowledge management software templates were conceptualized to guide evidence retrieval from a central database.
The process included converting clinical questions to research questions, retrieving evidence, and data analysis.
A feedback loop for updating CPGs via translational researchers was described.

Main Results:

The presented templates facilitate the conversion of clinical questions into searchable research questions.
The process enables efficient retrieval and analysis of best evidence for clinical decision-making.
The framework supports the individualization and optimization of patient care.
The described reciprocation mechanism aids in the continuous updating of CPGs.

Conclusions:

The proposed knowledge management approach enhances the practical application of CPGs.
This systematic process supports evidence-based clinical decision-making and guideline improvement.
Translational researchers play a key role in maintaining and updating the evidence base for CPGs.