Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

08:55
Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
Published on: February 8, 2018
Frontostriatal dysfunction during response inhibition in Williams syndrome
Dean Mobbs1, Mark A Eckert, Debra Mills
1Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5719, USA.
Biological Psychiatry
|September 26, 2006
Summary
Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) show reduced brain activity in areas crucial for response inhibition, impacting behavioral control. This study highlights frontostriatal circuit dysfunction in WS.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Genetics
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Williams syndrome (WS) presents a unique model for studying gene-brain-cognition links.
- While WS cognitive and behavioral traits are known, deficits in social and behavioral inhibition require further investigation.
- This study focuses on the neural systems underlying response inhibition in WS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural mechanisms of response inhibition in individuals with Williams syndrome.
- To compare brain activity during a response inhibition task between WS patients and typically developing controls.
- To explore correlations between behavioral measures and neural activity in WS.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure blood oxygenation level dependence (BOLD) signals.
- Eleven individuals with WS and eleven typically developing (TD) controls performed a Go/NoGo response inhibition task.
- Correlations between behavioral data, neuropsychological measures, and BOLD signals were analyzed.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in behavioral accuracy were found between WS patients and TD controls.
- WS participants exhibited significantly reduced BOLD signal activity in the striatum, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex compared to controls.
- These findings suggest impaired activation of key cortical and subcortical structures for behavioral inhibition in WS.
Conclusions:
- Reduced engagement of frontostriatal circuits is evident in Williams syndrome.
- These neural differences may serve as biological markers for response inhibition deficits and the distinct social phenotype observed in WS.

