Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.2K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

635
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
635
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

40.9K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.9K
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

396
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
396

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Linking compromise and responsibility attribution to risky decision-making in dyadic foraging.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Transdiagnostic mental health symptom dimensions predict use of flexible model-based inference in complex environments.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Spatially periodic computation in the entorhinal-hippocampal circuit during navigation.

eLife·2026
Same author

Collective intelligence as collective information processing.

Cognition·2026
Same author

An intracranial dissection of human escape circuits.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Subregions in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex integrate threat and protective information to meta-represent safety.

PLoS biology·2025
Same journal

Topological skeleton analysis for network-based shape representation in biology and beyond.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Condition-specific neural signatures of reactivation during post-retrieval rest: An EEG study.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Multi-chaotic signal identification employing a causal cross-correlation neural network.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Repeated insertions at positions 261-280 in KPC-2 highlight a ceftazidime-avibactam resistance hotspot.

iScience·2026
Same journal

ROS inhibits microtubule dynamics and cell growth heterogeneity during Arabidopsis sepal morphogenesis.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Type 1 diabetes alters early macrophage-<i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> transcriptional coordination during infection.

iScience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Utilizing social foraging as a framework to study decisions in groups.

Ketika Garg1, Wenning Deng1, Dean Mobbs1,2

  • 1Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and Computation, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, HSS 228-77, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Iscience
|March 9, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces social foraging to understand group decisions, moving beyond individual choices. It proposes a framework integrating social and individual factors to explain collective behavior.

Keywords:
Cognitive neuroscienceNeuroscienceSocial sciences

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Ecology
  • Evolutionary Theory
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Foraging theory traditionally focuses on individual decision-making for resource acquisition.
  • Understanding social decisions in groups remains a complex challenge in behavioral sciences.
  • Existing models often overlook the integration of social and individual factors in collective choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose social foraging as a novel framework for studying social decisions.
  • To synthesize socio-cognitive elements relevant to social foraging, including social inference and collective behavior.
  • To develop a framework distinguishing and integrating asocial and social components in decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Literature synthesis of socio-cognitive elements and foraging paradigms.
  • Development of a conceptual framework for social foraging.
  • Analysis of decision-making processes from individual to collective scales.

Main Results:

  • Social foraging extends traditional foraging theory to group dynamics.
  • A framework is proposed that integrates individual (asocial) and social decision-making components.
  • The framework highlights how the interplay of these components shapes collective behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Social foraging offers a promising new avenue for studying social behavior across disciplines.
  • The proposed framework bridges research on individual and collective decision-making.
  • This approach facilitates a more comprehensive understanding of how groups make choices.