Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Utilizing social foraging as a framework to study decisions in groups
Ketika Garg1, Wenning Deng1, Dean Mobbs1,2
1Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and Computation, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, HSS 228-77, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
None:
A central goal of the behavioral sciences is to understand how individuals decide between rewarding and conflicting options. Foraging theory, which is rooted in ecology and evolutionary theory, has helped advance this pursuit but has largely focused on individual decision-making processes. In this article, we extend beyond individual agents and propose social foraging as a promising avenue to study social decisions. We synthesize key socio-cognitive elements of social interactions that are particularly amenable to study through foraging paradigms, such as social inference, coordination, and collective behavior, especially in humans. We then propose a social foraging framework that distinguishes between the asocial and social components involved in the decision-making process and describes how the integration of these components drives decisions in social foraging. Our framework bridges research across disciplines to provide a promising new avenue for the study of social behavior by linking decisions across different scales, from individuals to collectives.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Social Exchange Theory
Social Exchange Theory
Impact of Social Context on Individuals

