Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The "other" transformation required for visual-auditory integration: representational format.

Kristin Kelly Porter1, Jennifer M Groh

  • 1University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

Progress in Brain Research
|October 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence of phase resetting, not just pulses of sound, during eye movement-related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs).

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Individual variation in sound localization accuracy is correlated with the properties of eye movement-related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs).

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Hearing sounds when the eyes move: A case study implicating the tensor tympani in eye movement-related peripheral auditory activity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Multiplexing of visual-auditory signals in a predominantly auditory brain region.

iScience·2026
Same author

Spike count analysis for multiplexing inference (SCAMPI).

Journal of computational neuroscience·2026
Same author

Eye movement-related eardrum oscillations do not require current visual input.

Hearing research·2025
Same journal

Preface.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Mindfulness and meditation: Promoting emotional and cognitive health.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Cognitive stimulation enhancing memory and mental function.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

The science behind non-pharmacological interventions.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Technology-assisted interventions for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Ethical consideration in non-pharmacological treatments for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Progress in brain research·2025
See all related articles

Understanding how the brain processes spatial information is key. This study reveals that sound location is encoded using a "rate" code in the primate brain, unlike the "place" code for vision, impacting multisensory integration.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Multisensory integration relies on consistent spatial encoding across sensory modalities.
  • While spatial reference frames are well-studied, the representational format of auditory spatial information remains less understood.
  • Previous research has primarily focused on visual spatial coding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the representational format of sound location in the primate brain.
  • To compare auditory spatial coding with established visual spatial coding mechanisms.
  • To explore potential neural mechanisms for cross-modal spatial information transformation.

Main Methods:

  • Electrophysiological recordings in the primate inferior colliculus.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of neural responses to auditory stimuli at different locations.
  • Comparison of firing rate and place coding schemes for auditory signals.

    • Main Results:

    • Sound location in the inferior colliculus is primarily encoded using a neural "rate" code.
    • This rate code for auditory space contrasts with the "place" code typically used for visual space.
    • The findings highlight a difference in representational format between auditory and visual spatial information.

    Conclusions:

    • The primate auditory system employs a rate code for sound localization, distinct from the place code used for vision.
    • This difference in representational format presents a challenge for multisensory integration of spatial signals.
    • Further research is needed to elucidate mechanisms for transforming between rate and place codes for effective cross-modal spatial processing.