Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contextual control in discrimination reversal learning.

Metin Ungör1, Harald Lachnit

  • 1Faculty of Psychology, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Marburg, Germany. uengoer@staff.uni-marburg.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|October 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of prediction error on overt attention and learning in humans.

Behavioural processes·2023
Same author

An attentional perspective on differential fear conditioning in chronic pain: The informational value of safety cues.

Behaviour research and therapy·2021
Same author

Fear Extinction and Predictive Trait-Like Inter-Individual Differences in Rats Lacking the Serotonin Transporter.

International journal of molecular sciences·2021
Same author

Emergence of complex dynamics of choice due to repeated exposures to extinction learning.

Animal cognition·2021
Same author

Evidence for two attentional mechanisms during learning.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2021
Same author

Outcome unpredictability affects outcome-specific motivation to learn.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
See all related articles

Context influences predictive learning and decision-making. This study shows that distinct learning environments (contexts) control behavior, even when stimuli are familiar, highlighting context

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Learning and Memory

Background:

  • Understanding contextual control is crucial for explaining how organisms adapt behavior to changing environments.
  • Previous research suggests environmental cues can influence learning and memory retrieval.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of context in discrimination reversal learning in humans.
  • To determine if distinct training contexts acquire the ability to control behavioral responses independently.
  • To examine the influence of contextual manipulations on stimuli with consistent reinforcement histories.

Main Methods:

  • Three human predictive learning experiments were conducted.
  • Participants underwent discrimination training (Phase 1) and discrimination reversal training (Phase 2) in different contexts (Context 1 and Context 2).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Testing involved presenting stimuli in original and novel contexts to assess contextual control.

    • Main Results:

    • Behavioral performance during testing accurately reflected the contingencies learned in each specific training context.
    • Testing in a novel context (Context 3) resulted in a lack of discriminative responding between stimuli.
    • Contextual manipulations significantly affected performance even for stimuli with established reinforcement histories.

    Conclusions:

    • Each training context gains the capacity to control behavioral performance, demonstrating robust contextual influence.
    • Findings support unique-cue and configural theories in explaining how context modulates learning and responding.
    • Context plays a critical role in regulating predictive learning and behavioral flexibility.