Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A review and integration of models on delusion maintenance.

Psychological medicine·2026

Same author

No distorted prediction error processing in depression? Pupillary responses to expected vs. unexpected emotional information in clinically depressed and healthy individuals.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026

Same author

Appetitive and aversive classical conditioning: Self-reports and physiological responses.

Behavioural brain research·2025

Same author

ABA and AAB renewal of alcohol seeking in rats are reduced by exposure to beer before extinction.

Behavioural processes·2024

Same author

Are depressive symptoms linked to a reduced pupillary response to novel positive information?-An eye tracking proof-of-concept study.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Same author

The effect of prediction error on overt attention and learning in humans.

Behavioural processes·2023

Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Evidence for two attentional mechanisms during learning.

David Torrents-Rodas¹, Stephan Koenig^1,2, Metin Uengoer¹

¹Faculty of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)

|May 7, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated attentional mechanisms in associative learning. Findings reveal that attention is guided by both relative and overall prediction errors, supporting a hybrid model of attention.

Keywords:

Attention associative learning discrimination learning eye-tracking partial reinforcement

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Learning Sciences

Background:

Attentional mechanisms are crucial for efficient associative learning.
Two potential mechanisms influencing attention are relative prediction error and overall prediction error.
Understanding their interplay is key to a comprehensive model of attention.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide evidence for the combined effect of relative and overall prediction error mechanisms on attention during associative learning.
To investigate how different prediction error signals influence cue-specific attention.

Main Methods:

Participants' eye movements were recorded while they performed an associative learning task.
The task involved predicting outcomes based on cue pairs with varying relevance and outcome predictability.
Analysis focused on dwell times and fixation patterns to infer attentional allocation.

Main Results:

An attentional advantage for the relevant cue was observed in the initial stage, consistent with relative prediction error.
Attention to both relevant and irrelevant cues increased at the start of the second stage, aligning with overall prediction error.
These attentional shifts were reflected in both dwell times and fixation patterns.

Conclusions:

The study provides evidence for a hybrid model of attention, integrating both relative and overall prediction error signals.
Attentional allocation dynamically adjusts based on changing prediction error computations.
This dual-mechanism model offers a more complete explanation of attentional control in associative learning.