Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language01:16

Language

919
Language is a unique communication system that uses words and systematic rules to organize and transmit information. Unlike other forms of communication, which may involve postures, movements, odors, or vocalizations, language relies on symbols and grammar. This makes human communication distinct from that of other species, who also communicate but do not use language in the same way humans do.
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
919
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

825
Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs.
825
Language Development01:22

Language Development

925
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
925
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

806
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
806
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

3.9K
Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
3.9K
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

742
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
742

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detecting the full photoemission cone from laser-based ARPES experiments by leveraging deflector technology.

The Review of scientific instruments·2026
Same author

On-demand linkage cleavage in two-dimensional conjugated metal-organic frameworks for closed-loop recyclable electronics.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Emergent Chirality and Enantiomeric Selectivity in Layered NbOX_{2} Crystals.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Interpretation of Crystal Energy Landscapes with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.

Nano letters·2026
Same author

Bistable superlattice switching in a quantum spin Hall insulator.

Nature·2026
Same author

Emergent Heavy-Fermion Physics in a Family of Topological Insulators <i>R</i>AsS (<i>R</i> = Y, La, and Sm).

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Building word meanings from memories and predictions.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.8K

How native-like is non-native language processing?

Harald Clahsen1, Claudia Felser

  • 1Department of Linguistics, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK. harald@essex.ac.uk

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|October 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Psycholinguistics research reveals that non-native language (L2) processing can be native-like in some areas but differs in complex syntax, even for proficient speakers. Subtle distinctions are key to understanding L2 language processing.

More Related Videos

CN-GELFrEE - Clear Native Gel-eluted Liquid Fraction Entrapment Electrophoresis
11:38

CN-GELFrEE - Clear Native Gel-eluted Liquid Fraction Entrapment Electrophoresis

Published on: February 29, 2016

12.4K
Rapid Generation of Amyloid from Native Proteins In vitro
05:48

Rapid Generation of Amyloid from Native Proteins In vitro

Published on: December 5, 2013

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.8K
CN-GELFrEE - Clear Native Gel-eluted Liquid Fraction Entrapment Electrophoresis
11:38

CN-GELFrEE - Clear Native Gel-eluted Liquid Fraction Entrapment Electrophoresis

Published on: February 29, 2016

12.4K
Rapid Generation of Amyloid from Native Proteins In vitro
05:48

Rapid Generation of Amyloid from Native Proteins In vitro

Published on: December 5, 2013

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Second Language Acquisition
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Decades of research focused on native language (L1) processing.
  • Recent studies explore real-time comprehension and processing in non-native language (L2) speakers.
  • Traditional views suggest L2 learners face grammatical difficulties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate similarities and differences between L1 and L2 language processing.
  • To examine the extent to which L2 processing becomes native-like.
  • To identify specific linguistic domains where L1 and L2 processing diverge.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of L1 and L2 language processing.
  • Real-time psycholinguistic experiments (details not specified in abstract).
  • Focus on grammatical processing and complex syntax.

Main Results:

  • L2 processing can achieve native-like proficiency in certain linguistic subdomains, including aspects of grammar.
  • Significant differences persist between L1 and L2 processing in the domain of complex syntax.
  • These differences are observed even in highly proficient L2 speakers.

Conclusions:

  • L2 language processing exhibits both native-like characteristics and persistent differences compared to L1 processing.
  • Complex syntax remains a challenging area for L2 speakers, irrespective of proficiency.
  • A nuanced understanding of linguistic distinctions is necessary to fully grasp non-native language processing.