Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
Antisepsis
Paolo Bianchi1, Emanuela Buoncristiani, Umberto Buoncristiani
1Ospedale S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Abstract:
All dialysis treatments include a certain risk of infection because of the decreased immune defenses of the patients and because of dialytic techniques that increase the potential of microbial contamination. Peritoneal dialysis, and in particular continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), has a higher risk of infections of the peritoneum, but even of the subcutaneous tunnel. These infections are caused by environmental microorganisms principally gram-positives (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus). We tested three active ingredients, electrolytic chloroxidizer, iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate. It is evident that because of the large spectrum of activity, the good effectiveness even at the lowest concentration, coupled with good tolerability (and to the fact of not causing allergic reactions) the electrolytic chloroxidizer appears to be an ideal antiseptic in CAPD.
Insights
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients face infection risks. Electrolytic chloroxidizer demonstrated superior effectiveness and tolerability compared to iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate as an ideal antiseptic for CAPD.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Infectious Diseases
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Dialysis treatments carry inherent infection risks due to compromised patient immunity and procedural contamination.
- Peritoneal dialysis (PD), especially continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), presents a heightened risk for peritoneal and subcutaneous tunnel infections.
- Gram-positive bacteria, notably Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus, are the primary causative agents of these infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of three antiseptic agents for use in CAPD.
- To identify an optimal antiseptic to mitigate infection risks associated with CAPD.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of three active ingredients: electrolytic chloroxidizer, iodine, and chlorhexidine gluconate.
- Assessment of antiseptic spectrum of activity, effectiveness at low concentrations, and tolerability, including potential for allergic reactions.
Main Results:
- Electrolytic chloroxidizer exhibited a broad spectrum of activity against common CAPD pathogens.
- This agent demonstrated significant effectiveness even at the lowest tested concentrations.
- Good tolerability and a lack of allergic reactions were noted for electrolytic chloroxidizer.
Conclusions:
- Electrolytic chloroxidizer emerges as a highly suitable antiseptic for CAPD applications.
- Its broad-spectrum efficacy, effectiveness at low concentrations, and favorable tolerability profile make it an ideal choice for CAPD infection prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Asepsis
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Tetanus
