Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

(De)constructing 'basic' benefits: citizens define the limits of coverage.

Marjorie Ginsburg1, Susan Dorr Goold, Marion Danis

  • 1Sacramento Healthcare Decisions in Rancho Cordova, California, USA. ginsburg@sacdecisions.org

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|November 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Still Learning from Oregonians About Medicaid.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026
Same author

Deliberations on Government Spending Priorities: Listen to the People.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Referrals to a Novel Health Care Equity Consult Service.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Information about Clinical Ethics Consultation Services on US Hospital Websites.

AJOB empirical bioethics·2026
Same author

Deliberating at a Distance: Evaluating the Feasibility of a Fully Virtual CHAT Exercise Among Low-Income Communities.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2025
Same author

Principlistic Equality: The Relative Importance of the Four Principles Among Primary and Urgent Care Clinicians.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same journal

National Health Expenditure Projections, 2025-34: Strong Utilization Growth Initially, Legislative Impacts Later.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

State Medicaid Programs Face Increased Spending On Medicare Premiums.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Not enough time.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Medicaid Tobacco And Nicotine Cessation Treatment Rates Remained Low, 2019-24.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Third-Party Convener Firms And The Rise Of Geographically Dispersed, High-Earning Medicare ACOs.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

The Opacity Of Price Transparency.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
See all related articles

Community members defined "basic" health care coverage by prioritizing essential needs and cost-effectiveness. They supported guidelines and excluded low-value interventions, highlighting the need for public input in policy decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Public Health Policy
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Defining "basic" health care coverage is crucial for initiatives aimed at covering the uninsured.
  • Existing proposals often lack clear definitions of essential health services.
  • Understanding public perception of basic coverage is vital for policy development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore community perspectives on defining "basic" health care coverage.
  • To identify essential versus nonessential health care needs from a public viewpoint.
  • To understand public tolerance for cost-sharing and provider restrictions within a limited budget.

Main Methods:

  • A computer-based simulation exercise involving nearly 800 community members in northern California.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants worked within a simulated limited budget to make coverage decisions.
  • Analysis focused on identifying inclusions, exclusions, and preferences for coverage components.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants distinguished essential from nonessential health care needs.
    • Community members resisted high patient cost-sharing but tolerated some provider choice restrictions.
    • Support was found for practice guidelines and effectiveness standards, with exclusion of high-cost, low-value interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • Community input is essential for defining "basic" health care coverage.
    • Public preferences indicate a focus on value and essential services over broad, unrestricted access.
    • Simulation exercises can effectively gauge public opinion on complex health policy issues.