Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Spatial Measurements of Perfusion, Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Liposomes Accumulation in Solid Tumors
Published on: August 18, 2016
Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography
Srinath C Yeshwant1, Ronald M Summers, Jianhua Yao
1Diagnostic Radiology Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Room 1C351, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892-1182, USA.
Computed tomographic (CT) colonography polyp measurements were compared to optical colonoscopy. Manual 3D linear measurements (L(M3D)) best approximated optical colonoscopy size, while automated linear measurements are ideal for tracking polyp size changes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Gastroenterology
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate polyp size measurement is crucial for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.
- Computed tomographic (CT) colonography offers a less invasive alternative to optical colonoscopy.
- Standardizing polyp size measurements in CT colonography is essential for reliable assessment of change over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the most accurate CT colonography-based polyp measurement for comparison with optical colonoscopy.
- To determine which CT colonography measurement method is most reliable for assessing changes in polyp size during serial examinations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 216 patients undergoing prone and supine CT colonography with same-day optical colonoscopy.
- Polyp size was measured using three linear and two volume methods, with both manual and automated segmentation.
- Measurements were assessed for compatibility with optical colonoscopy size and reproducibility (inter-scan, inter-observer, intra-observer variability).
Main Results:
- Manual 3D linear measurements (L(M3D)) showed high confidence in identifying polyps <1.0 cm at optical colonoscopy.
- The smallest inter-scan (prone vs. supine) size difference was observed for L(M3D) and linear diameter from automated volume measurements.
- Linear diameter measurements on a 2D display exhibited the lowest inter-observer and intra-observer variability.
Conclusions:
- Manual 3D linear measurement (L(M3D)) best approximates polyp size as measured by optical colonoscopy.
- Linear diameter derived from automated volume measurements demonstrates minimal variation between scans and avoids observer bias, making it optimal for monitoring polyp size changes.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
