Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: indirect measurement and test faking
James M LeBreton1, Cheryl D Barksdale, Jennifer Robin
1Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. lebreton@psych.purdue.edu
Abstract:
Conditional reasoning is a new measurement technique used to measure cognitive biases associated with latent personality motives. The current article describes 3 studies examining 2 related measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests (CRTs). Study 1 examined the necessity of maintaining indirect assessment when administering CRTs. Results indicated that, compared with a control condition, 2 experimental conditions that disclosed the purpose of assessment yielded significant mean shifts on a CRT. Study 2 explored whether CRTs could be faked when the purpose of assessment was not disclosed. Results indicated that when indirect measurement was maintained, CRTs appeared to be resistant to faking. Study 3 compared scores on the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression across student, applicant, and incumbent samples. Results indicated no significant mean differences among these samples.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Understanding Deception
Inductive Reasoning
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Estimation of the Physical Quantities

