Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Serial Enrichment of Spermatogonial Stem and Progenitor Cells (SSCs) in Culture for Derivation of Long-term Adult Mouse SSC Lines
Published on: February 25, 2013
Aging does not affect spermatogenic recovery after experimentally induced injury in mice
Jens Ehmcke1, Bhavika Joshi, Scott D Hergenrother
1Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, W952 Biomedical Science Towers, 3500 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh 15261, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract:
Testes in aging mammals undergo a variety of age-related changes, such as reduction of size, lower sperm output, an increase in abnormal forms of sperm, and endocrine malfunctions. It has been suggested that the spermatogenic defects are due to loss and dysfunction of spermatogonial stem cells as well as deterioration of the tubule microenvironment. In the present study, we explore the depletion and recovery of spermatogenesis in young (3 month) and old (12 month) mice exposed to cooling, X-irradiation (5 Gy) or cytotoxic treatment using Busulfan (40 mg/kg). We aim to determine a potential age-related change of vulnerability to gonadotoxic treatments by describing the intensity of spermatogenic depletion and the degree of spermatogenic recolonization with qualitative and quantitative parameters on organ weights and histological parameters at two time points (2 weeks, depletion; 6 weeks, recovery). Our data reveal specific acute effects of cooling on multinucleation of germ cells but no other severe injury. Irradiation and Busulfan-treatment exerted the expected depletional wave of germ cells leading to severe testicular injury and spermatogenic failure. The recovery of spermatogenesis occurred in both treatment groups and both age groups to a similar extent. We therefore noted no prominent age-related differences in spermatogenic depletion and recovery in any treatment group. We conclude that in both age groups, the remaining spermatogonial stem cells are capable to induce spermatogenic recovery and the aging tubule microenvironment at 1 year has not become more vulnerable to irradiation, Busulfan-treatment or testicular cooling.
Insights
Aging male mammals experience testicular changes. This study found that young and old mice showed similar spermatogenic depletion and recovery after cooling, irradiation, or Busulfan treatment, indicating no significant age-related vulnerability.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Biology
- Gerontology
- Toxicology
Background:
- Aging mammals exhibit testicular atrophy, reduced sperm production, and endocrine dysfunction.
- Spermatogenic defects in aging are linked to stem cell loss and a deteriorating tubule microenvironment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate age-related differences in testicular vulnerability to gonadotoxic agents.
- To assess spermatogenic depletion and recovery in young versus old mice.
Main Methods:
- Young (3-month) and old (12-month) mice were exposed to testicular cooling, X-irradiation (5 Gy), or Busulfan (40 mg/kg).
- Spermatogenesis was evaluated at 2 weeks (depletion) and 6 weeks (recovery) using organ weights and histological parameters.
Main Results:
- Cooling caused transient multinucleation of germ cells but no severe injury.
- X-irradiation and Busulfan induced significant germ cell depletion and spermatogenic failure in both age groups.
- Spermatogenesis recovery occurred to a similar extent in young and old mice across all treatment groups.
Conclusions:
- No prominent age-related differences in spermatogenic depletion or recovery were observed.
- Remaining spermatogonial stem cells effectively initiated recovery in both young and old mice.
- The aging tubule microenvironment (at 1 year) did not show increased vulnerability to the tested gonadotoxic treatments.
More Related Videos
09:41Functional Assessment of Kinesin-7 CENP-E in Spermatocytes Using In Vivo Inhibition, Immunofluorescence and Flow Cytometry
Published on: December 28, 2021
06:38Determination of Reproductive Competence by Confirming Pubertal Onset and Performing a Fertility Assay in Mice and Rats
Published on: October 13, 2018