Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

07:43
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Modelling skin pelvic landmark coordinates into corresponding internal bone for wheelchair users
Nadine-Michèle Lalonde1, Jean Dansereau, Michèle Lacoste
1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, C.P. 6079 succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada. nadine_michele_lalonde@hotmail.com
IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering
|January 31, 2007
Summary
This study explored how body mass and skinfold thickness influence pelvic landmark accuracy. Manual digitization of external pelvic landmarks offers better accuracy than skin markers by reducing soft tissue artifacts.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Anatomy
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Accurate identification of pelvic landmarks is crucial for clinical applications.
- External landmarks are often used as surrogates for internal pelvic structures.
- Soft tissue overlying the pelvis can introduce inaccuracies in landmark identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between internal and external pelvic landmarks using linear regression.
- To determine if body mass index (BMI) or skinfold thickness significantly influence these relationships.
- To compare the accuracy of manual digitization versus skin markers for identifying external pelvic landmarks.
Main Methods:
- Internal pelvic landmarks were identified using a stereoradiographic method.
- External pelvic landmarks were digitized manually or via skin markers.
- Linear regression models were employed to analyze the relationships between internal and external landmarks, incorporating BMI and skinfold thickness.
Main Results:
- External pelvic landmark coordinates generally differed statistically from internal ones.
- Manual digitization reduced soft tissue artifacts compared to skin markers.
- BMI and skinfold thickness were significant variables in regression models, particularly concerning soft tissue thickness directions.
Conclusions:
- Manual digitization of external pelvic landmarks is more accurate than using skin markers.
- Soft tissue thickness, influenced by BMI and skinfold measurements, affects pelvic landmark accuracy.
- Further research is needed to develop comprehensive models for understanding internal-external pelvic landmark relationships.

