Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly.

Simon J Walsh1, Kathy McAuley, Paul W Johnston

  • 1Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, 1st Floor West Wing, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast.

The Ulster Medical Journal
|February 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main stenosis: 10-year final results from the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Workflow-based Framework to Aid with High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound-Optimised Coronary Stenting: Introducing IVUS 123 Essentials.

Interventional cardiology (London, England)·2026
Same author

Proximal Cap Ambiguity.

Interventional cardiology clinics·2025
Same author

PCI of Native Coronary Artery vs Saphenous Vein Graft After Prior Bypass Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2025
Same author

Complications Following Retrieval of an Embolized Guide Catheter Tip Following Left Main Bifurcation PCI.

JACC. Case reports·2025
Same author

Impact of Anatomical and Viability-Guided Completeness of Revascularization on Clinical Outcomes in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2024

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers symptomatic benefits for elderly patients, but carries a significant one-year mortality risk, especially with incomplete revascularization.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Geriatric Medicine

Background:

  • Elderly patients represent a growing demographic undergoing cardiovascular interventions.
  • Assessing the risks and benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in this high-risk group is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical risks and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients aged 80 years and older.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 55 PCI procedures in patients over 80 years old.
  • Data collection included demographics, procedural details, in-hospital complications, and 12-month outcomes via follow-up.

Main Results:

  • High procedural risk scores (TIMI 4, EuroSCORE 9) but a 95% angiographic success rate.

Related Experiment Videos

  • No in-hospital complications observed; significant improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (4 to 1).
  • Twelve-month mortality was 22% (10 cardiovascular deaths), with incomplete revascularization linked to 8 deaths.

    • Conclusions:

    • PCI is feasible in elderly, high-risk patients, demonstrating low in-hospital mortality and substantial symptomatic improvement.
    • A significant one-year mortality exists, particularly for those undergoing incomplete revascularization, highlighting the need for careful patient selection and strategy.