Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gene decay in archaea.

M W J van Passel1, C S Smillie, H Ochman

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, 1007 East Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. mvpassel@email.arizona.edu

Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.)
|March 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum: Mobile genes in the human microbiome are structured from global to individual scales.

Nature·2017
Same author

Mobile genes in the human microbiome are structured from global to individual scales.

Nature·2016
Same author

Application of the Human Intestinal Tract Chip to the non-human primate gut microbiota.

Beneficial microbes·2014
Same author

Selection on the genic location of disruptive elements.

Trends in genetics : TIG·2007
Same author

A biased detection of the flexible genome content: missing large restriction fragments in comparative genomics.

Journal of microbiological methods·2006
Same author

An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons.

BMC genomics·2005
Same journal

Ribosomal Protein Cluster Organization in Asgard Archaea.

Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.)·2024
Same journal

VOLN27B: A New Head-Tailed Halovirus Isolated from an Underground Salt Crystal and Infecting <i>Halorubrum</i>.

Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.)·2022
Same journal

Biological Processes for Pollution Control: Current Research and Emerging Technologies 2020.

Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.)·2021
Same journal

The Ability of Hop Extracts to Reduce the Methane Production of <i>Methanobrevibacter ruminantium</i>.

Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.)·2021
Same journal

Structural and Kinetic Characterization of Hyperthermophilic NADH-Dependent Persulfide Reductase from <i>Archaeoglobus fulgidus</i>.

Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.)·2021
Same journal

Analysis of a Methanogen and an Actinobacterium Dominating the Thermophilic Microbial Community of an Electromethanogenic Biocathode.

Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.)·2021
See all related articles

Pseudogenes, or inactive genes, are common in archaea, often resulting from gene truncations or frameshift mutations. Archaea appear to retain these pseudogenes longer than bacteria, leading to unique genomic repertoires.

Area of Science:

  • Microbial genomics
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Gene-dense chromosomes in archaea and bacteria were previously assumed to lack pseudogenes.
  • Advancements in genome sequencing enable whole-genome comparisons, revealing numerous inactivated genes (pseudogenes).
  • Comparative genomic analyses are crucial for understanding gene evolution and genome dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prevalence and characteristics of pseudogenes in archaeal genomes.
  • To compare pseudogene retention and formation mechanisms between archaea and bacteria.
  • To understand the evolutionary implications of pseudogene accumulation in archaea.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of sequenced archaeal genomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification and classification of pseudogenes based on mutation types (truncations, frameshifts).
  • Quantification of pseudogene proportions within annotated coding sequences.

    • Main Results:

    • Pseudogenes are prevalent in archaeal genomes, comprising up to 8.6% of annotated coding sequences.
    • Gene truncations are the primary cause of pseudogene formation, followed by frameshift mutations.
    • Archaeal genomes show a higher frequency of pseudogenes with multiple inactivating mutations, suggesting slower deletion rates compared to bacteria.

    Conclusions:

    • Archaea retain pseudogenes for longer evolutionary periods than bacteria.
    • The mechanisms of pseudogene formation and retention contribute to the unique genomic repertoires observed in archaea.
    • Pseudogene analysis provides insights into genome evolution and the dynamics of gene inactivation in prokaryotes.