Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.

Jay Parikh1, Darlene Fanus

  • 1Women's Diagnostic Imaging Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA. jay.parikh@swedish.org

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|April 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engaging Young Professionals in Radvocacy: Why It Matters and How ACR Chapters Can Lead the Way.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Erratum: The Impact of Preference Signaling on Interview Invitations and Match Outcomes in the 2023 to 2024 Orthopaedic Residency Cycle: A Retrospective Review.

JB & JS open access·2025
Same author

The Impact of Preference Signaling on Interview Invitations and Match Outcomes in the 2023 to 2024 Orthopaedic Residency Cycle: A Retrospective Review.

JB & JS open access·2025
Same author

Antipsychotic Polypharmacy for Treatment Resistant Schizoaffective Disorder: A Case Report.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Psychosis in a Military Veteran in the Context of Hallucinogen Use: A Case Report.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Nontechnical Factors and Postprocedural Considerations for Image-guided Breast Biopsy.

Journal of breast imaging·2024
Same journal

Comment on "Validation of a Single-Item Screener for Financial Toxicity in Outpatient Imaging Patients".

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Comparison of supplemental breast cancer screening outcomes for automated versus hand-held ultrasound.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Screening Mammography Completion Among Women Enrolled in a Lung Cancer Screening Program.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Hantavirus Infection Beyond the Lung: A Multi-Organ Radiological Perspective on Diagnosis, Imaging Modalities, and Precautionary Measures for Radiology Departments.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2026 Update.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Knee Pain: Update 2026.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
See all related articles

Full-field digital mammography offers precise quality control for breast imaging, though it is more complex and costly than traditional methods. Manufacturers establish specific quality control processes per FDA regulations.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Quality Control

Background:

  • The United States is transitioning breast imaging centers from screen-film mammography to full-field digital mammography.
  • Full-field digital mammography presents unique quality control challenges compared to traditional methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the complexities and precision of quality control in full-field digital mammography.
  • To outline the regulatory framework for full-field digital mammography quality control.

Main Methods:

  • The study discusses the transition to digital mammography and its quality control implications.
  • It contrasts the quality control processes of screen-film and full-field digital mammography.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quality control for full-field digital mammography is more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive.
  • However, it is also more precise in identifying noncompliant components.
  • Each manufacturer develops its own quality control process, adhering to FDA requirements.

Conclusions:

  • The adoption of full-field digital mammography necessitates advanced and manufacturer-specific quality control measures.
  • Despite challenges, the precision of digital mammography quality control is crucial for accurate breast imaging.
  • Regulatory compliance, driven by the FDA, is paramount in establishing these quality control protocols.