Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital mammography: current capabilities and obstacles.

Jay Parikh1

  • 1Women's Diagnostic Imaging Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. jay.parikh@swedish.org

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|April 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engaging Young Professionals in Radvocacy: Why It Matters and How ACR Chapters Can Lead the Way.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Erratum: The Impact of Preference Signaling on Interview Invitations and Match Outcomes in the 2023 to 2024 Orthopaedic Residency Cycle: A Retrospective Review.

JB & JS open access·2025
Same author

The Impact of Preference Signaling on Interview Invitations and Match Outcomes in the 2023 to 2024 Orthopaedic Residency Cycle: A Retrospective Review.

JB & JS open access·2025
Same author

Antipsychotic Polypharmacy for Treatment Resistant Schizoaffective Disorder: A Case Report.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Psychosis in a Military Veteran in the Context of Hallucinogen Use: A Case Report.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Nontechnical Factors and Postprocedural Considerations for Image-guided Breast Biopsy.

Journal of breast imaging·2024
Same journal

Comment on "Validation of a Single-Item Screener for Financial Toxicity in Outpatient Imaging Patients".

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Comparison of supplemental breast cancer screening outcomes for automated versus hand-held ultrasound.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Screening Mammography Completion Among Women Enrolled in a Lung Cancer Screening Program.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Hantavirus Infection Beyond the Lung: A Multi-Organ Radiological Perspective on Diagnosis, Imaging Modalities, and Precautionary Measures for Radiology Departments.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2026 Update.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Knee Pain: Update 2026.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
See all related articles

Digital mammography offers operational efficiencies and advanced applications for breast imaging compared to screen-film mammography. Overcoming clinical and operational challenges is key for its widespread adoption in breast screening.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Digital mammography is an emerging technology for breast imaging and screening.
  • It offers potential operational efficiencies over traditional screen-film mammography (SFM).
  • Digital platforms enable advanced applications beyond SFM capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the potential of digital mammography in breast imaging and screening.
  • To compare the operational efficiencies of digital mammography with SFM.
  • To identify hurdles for the clinical implementation of digital mammography.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of digital mammography and SFM.
  • Assessment of functional component decoupling in digital systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of operational and clinical challenges.

    • Main Results:

    • Digital mammography presents potential operational efficiencies due to component decoupling.
    • The technology serves as a platform for advanced applications unavailable with SFM.
    • Significant operational and clinical hurdles remain for widespread adoption.

    Conclusions:

    • Digital mammography shows promise for breast imaging and screening.
    • Its advantages include operational efficiencies and advanced capabilities.
    • Overcoming existing challenges is crucial for replacing SFM in clinical practice.